User talk:Lexers615

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damaged beyond repairs (October 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damaged beyond repairs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Damaged_beyond_repairs Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Damaged_beyond_repairs reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   11:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Ammarpad. I noticed that you made a comment on the page AFC Help Desk that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ammarpad (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Given your page is filled with various promotional content, I gave up trying to squeeze a comment in it, as one could easily say it would have gone unnoticed.
 * Regarding your claim of uncivility, I find it is more polite to use trash talk to insult someone rather than some canned literary text that means exactly the same but goes under the radar when it comes to word filter. Obviously, you disagree...
 * Lexers615 (talk) 12:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Although I don't understand what you're trying to say fully, I am advising you to be calm and cool down. I know rejecting somebody's submission after hard work is very frustrating but even if that editor accepted your article it will certainly be deleted in few hours because Wikipedia is not a dictionary and your submission is entirely one dictionary definition copied from Webster Dictionary. Please keep calm and visit our Tea House. I am sure you'll love the place. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You clearly did not consult the provided link to Merriam-Webster's definition before making that claim, so I see little reasons to argue with you....
 * Lexers615 (talk) 13:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

You've been asked to stop wasting everyone's time and you have failed to comply with that, in addition to numerous personal attacks and lots of casting aspersions. We're here to build an encyclopedia, not create drama.  A  Train talk 08:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Damaged beyond repairs concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Damaged beyond repairs, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Damaged beyond repairs


Hello,. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Draft:Damaged beyond repairs".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Eagleash (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)