User talk:Lexi1520

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_Bhutan

Update info and look for more present tense information, because most of the information comes is from 2016 or before.

Revise some of the sections like Biogas and Solar energy if possible, because there is very little information.

Add visual elements. Compared to articles such as Renewable energy in Republic of Ireland, this article is lacking graphs, charts, and/or images of the type of renewable energy.

proposal feedback
Thanks for posting your proposal. This sounds like a good plan. If you need any help with your edits or with the Wikipedia interface, please let me know. -KS (DeerJerky (talk) 21:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

additional suggestions
I looked for a while for additional info, but what I found is that, because Bhutan uses almost exclusively renewable energy, most of the current info is already written in the Energy in Bhutan article. (In fact, the renewable article should probably just be deleted, since it's redundant.)

Alternatively, you might consider switching to the Bordeaux article. Most of the History, Geography, Climate, and Politics sections have no sources. Maybe you could try searching for a credible source to verify a few of the events in the history? Also, that history section is really long, so you might add some subheadings to subdivide it. How's that sound?

-KS (DeerJerky (talk) 15:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Virtual in-class activity.

I did do what you suggested to do to the Bordeaux article. In the history section, I split it into two subheadings. I then went through and added a couple sources that I found online throughout that section, because it definitely lacked throughout. However, I did forget to sign my name to my changes. I apologize for that! This assignment was difficult, because I could not find anything for my original proposal. Then, trying to see where any of the sources in the reference list fit in the history section and citing was kind of difficult. This assignment taught me that Wikipedia is not as easy to edit as you think it is and it is easy to lose where you are at in the article.