User talk:Lexi1979

Please don't delete sourced material without consensus
Please don't delete material without coming to a consensus on the talk page. Also, the material you deleted had two sources.

Thanks a lot!WacoJacko (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Again, please stop deleting sourced material. This seems to be a single purpose account, created specifically for the purpose of making unconstructive edits on the Larry Sinclair article.WacoJacko (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Please don't add inappropriate, unsourced material without consensus
The material added is per se dafamatory relating to mental illness is not appropriately sourced. It violated untold Wikipedia policies. The unsourced material should be removed.

Posted by: Lexi1979 in response to multiple violations of Wikipedia rules relating to posting addresses of private persons and making unsourced claims of mental illness. The HUD documents cited show that the complex of Mr. Sinclair is for the elderly and disabled. Mentally ill persons are not housed with the elderly per HUD rules. The content posted by Wacko is per se defamatory.

Please remember to sign your posts
Please sign all your posts when editing on Wikipedia. You can do this by using four ~'s. Thank youWacoJacko (talk) 04:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Just for the record
Just for the record, I am not affiliated with the Obama campaign in any way. I am not quite sure what gave you that idea. If you look at my edit history, I have edited a multitude of different articles. I have also been editing here for a decent amount of time. You, on the other hand, are a new account, who has only edited the Larry Sinclair article, that would make you a single purpose account. You are in no position to go making these unproven, wild claims. Either way, I have proposed that the sinclair article be deleted. ThanksWacoJacko (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I am confused, it seems that you are replying to my comments on another user's talk page. Irregardless, I am not affiliated with the Obama campaign or website. Not that it matters anymore, I proposed the sinclair article for speedy deletion and it has been deleted.WacoJacko (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Mattleback
User Mattleback, who created this entry, posted on the Obama 08 website that he was creating a Larry Sinclair debunking page for the purpose of discrediting Mr. Sinclair and invited other participants. The matter is now widely reported on various internet sites. He then claimed that Mr. Sinclair was mentally ill and cited to HUD documents that showed that the housing complex was for the elderly and disabled, not mentally ill persons. He then repeteadly deleted information stated in the Jeff Rense documents that objectively lended to the facts. By any measure, and by his own admission, Mattleback is a partisan, political hack who violated untold policies of Wikpedia, including per se defamation of a person, drawing attention to their home address when there is a lawsuit of record alleging death threats, among other things. Mattleback has been challenged in all of these regards for his untold violation of Wikipedia policy.--Lexi1979 (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)