User talk:Lexikav

Image tagging for Image:Kathleen York.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Kathleen York.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:BirdYork1.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BirdYork1.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BirdYork1.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:BirdYork1.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:BirdYork2.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BirdYork2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The image was removed because it looked like a professionally made head shot (which you confirmed it is) and there was nothing to support the claim that you were the copyright holder as the image tag you added to the image description claimed (Wikipedia gets a lot of these type of uploads, so we have to err on the side of caution). Usually the photographer will be the copyright holder, unless Ms. York had a work for hire agreement. This means there was an agreement that copyright would pass to Ms. York. Just because the work was paid for does not mean Ms. York owns the copyright without an explicit agreement that transfer of copyright was part of the deal.


 * To keep the image, you need a written agreement from the copyright holder that specifies that he/she releases the image under a certain license. I recommend you specify a "Creative Commons attribution share-alike 3.0 unported" license. Here is a page that specifies what that means. If you get an e-mail from the copyright holder that is specific that they release the image to be used under a "Creative Commons attribution share-alike 3.0 unported" license (or GFDL or into the public domain, whichever they prefer) and post it on my talk page or e-mail it to me (click the "E-mail this user link" on the left side of my talk page), we can take it from there and get the image restored. The e-mail must have contact information for the copyright holder for verification. Also see WP:COPYREQ -Regards Nv8200p talk 15:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)