User talk:Lexipro4933

October 2022
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Matt Birk, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Rockchalk 717 05:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Nothing defamatory was added. I simply added a direct quote, word for word, as spoken by Matt Birk himself and includes appropriate reference. Please explain why you keep removing my edit, otherwise I'm adding it back and escalating the issue. Thank you. Lexipro4933 (talk) 05:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes it is 100% defamatory. I would genuinely love to see you try to "escalate" allowing something like "Birk does not believes that the most important job for a woman is to stay at home with her children." in the article Which is the utter definition of defamatory and libel. The only part of what you added that is ok is believes in no exceptions. I caution you to read WP:WAR, WP:BLPREMOVE, WP:LIBEL.-- Rockchalk 717 05:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Additionally, there is also already information about his views on abortion in the article including his controversial comments referenced in the citation you added.-- Rockchalk 717 05:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I've also requested a revision deletion to redact your comment as well.-- Rockchalk 717 05:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

I'll concede removing the sentence about him believing that 'women belong in the kitchen' to be removed as I did not properly source that quote.

The direct quote I added is appropriate and in line with the rest of the details regarding his personal life. In the very quote, he talks about his personal beliefs on abortion, his daughters, and his wife, all of which are in this same section. Please explain how that quote about his personal beliefs and his own family is not pertinent to his personal life section. Also please explain how a direct quote, in this manner, by the living person can be defamatory. Lexipro4933 (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The quote isn't really what was defamatory. Just the comment I specifically said was. The quote is unnecessary because as I've already said that controversial statement he made about abortion is already mentioned, not to mention the quote is unnecessarily long.-- Rockchalk 717 05:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)