User talk:Lexiterwilliger

I noted the "hangon" tag you applied to your article, and the comments you made on its associated talk page, which I reproduce here for your convenience: "The Swinph Swodes page should not be deleted because first off its not copywriting anything because Swinph Swodes are my creation. Secondly, I did not use any vulgar language in my article. Thirdly because i did not "bad mouth" any one/thing in my artcle. And forth, because I believe that the public deservs to know what Swinph Swodes are because they are a very important mutated realative of the platypuses and they'd be hurt if no one knew about them." I certainly agree with the first three of your points; there is no copyright violation, no vulgar language and no bad-mouthing of anyone, and I thank you for those elements of your article. Unfortunately I cannot agree with your last one; the public may deserve to know about your creations, but it will not be able to do so through Wikipedia, because we have a specific policy that Wikipedia is not for stuff you made up, and when you say you made up the topic, that's the main reason I had to delete the article. In fact, all articles on Wikipedia have to be about notable topics -- topics that experts have written about in newspapers and books and other reliable sources. So it's not so much that your creation is not important, but that it hasn't been demonstrated to be important by experts in such things. You can find out more about the types of things that Wikipedia articles ARE about by reading this article and looking at the introductory material I left for you above this note. Best of luck with your future contributions. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC)