User talk:Lexkaye21

Welcome
 Hello, Lexkaye21, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
 * The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Lexkaye21, good luck, and have fun. Lightbluerain ❄ (Talk | contribs)  02:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on L. Lin Wood, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

The text as it original read leans heavy one way with a incredible bias. It should be facts, not opinions. Why not initiate a conversation with me BEFORE reverting back to the original text? Lexkaye21 (talk) 00:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Please review WP:BRD, WP:TRUTH, & WP:FALSEBALANCE  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at L. Lin Wood. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (L. Lin Wood) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

It is a punishment. YOU are blocking me from editing for doing exactly what YOU have done,, revert and delete my could tribution. Wikipedia should report facts, not insert opinions. I will make sure to copy the link and share with the page with the attorney Lin Wood himself so you may find yourself in a legal situation. I tried to correct the errors on the page to avoid this, however, YOU kept deleting and reverting my edits. How is one better than the other? Stick to the facts about people, not conjecture. Lexkaye21 (talk) 06:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

I didn't threaten legal action, reread the sentence. Wikipedia is a joke. Make this ban permanent for editing. We rather go somewhere else to find actual factual information than the bias it allows to reign on your pages. Lexkaye21 (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I will make sure to copy the link and share with the page with the attorney Lin Wood himself so you may find yourself in a legal situation. How is this not a legal threat? It clearly threatens a legal situation, and your intent is obvious what that means. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). 01:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Ridiculous, not a threat. I informed you I would share with Lin Wood since it is about him and misinformation. He is an attorney and it is obvious he pursues Justice. That's informative, not a threat. Get a grip. Lexkaye21 (talk) 21:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you're going to debunk a claim, at least provide evidence for it. You'll notice that not only have I made a claim, I clearly pointed out why, and your reply does nothing to address it. Also, I've never ever engaged with you personally before, as you'd know if you paid any attention to signatures. Good luck trying to intimidate me under the Australian legal system. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). 10:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * When you are blocked, you should only be using your talk page for unblock appeals. Please do not copy/paste large swaths of copyrighted content here, as you just did in the edit I reverted. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Who are you to tell me what to do. I will reply as I wish. Lexkaye21 (talk) 00:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm the blocking admin who just removed your talk page access due to repeated misuse. WP:COPYVIO applies everywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)