User talk:Lezhou1/sandbox


 * Article Evaluation

Article: Financial Crisis of 2007-2008

This article has a detailed and comprehensive introduction and summary of the financial crisis dating back to 2008. The article has been divided into several parts which are focused on its summary, causes, effects, government responses and so on. All the parts are important and necessary for the record of this big event. But I feel that the section "Media Coverage" is distracted for me to read this article. I think it shouldn't be an individual section for this event. People reading this article mainly because they care about the crisis itself and "Media Coverage" can be categorized into "See Also" session or titled as "related documents".Lezhou1 (talk) 03:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Improve the article: Borrowing center (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borrowing_center)

The notes in this page said that the article needs more content to represent a worldwide view of the subject. I found a piece of news(link:http://www.didiy.eu/blogs/library-didiy-tools-and-things-movement-still-missing-europe) talked about borrowing center in Europe, but the source is from a website and might not be reliable. I need to find more scholar essay or journal/report for the subject.

Rachel Lee's Peer Review
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Yes, The article I chose talks about borrowing centers in Europe, but there is no sufficient research results on why there is fewer borrowing center in Europe than in North America.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

The article only talks about borrowing centers in North American, in order to make it a neutral article, I will add sections about borrowing centers in other parts of the world.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

More viewpoints about borrowing centers such as pros and cons need to be added.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

More reliable sources such as scholar essays and journals are needed.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

This article needs more introductions with diversity of borrowing centers all over the world. So at current stage, it is not a neutral article.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

More sections about borrowing centers in other parts of the world need to be added. And also the history development of borrowing center is needed.

Rachelhannahlee (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)