User talk:Lfgarcia726/sandbox

Peer Review Spencer.Schulz
I am basing this off the first draft sub column! -Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? -Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? -Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? -Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * This idea would be a super cool article to see in the Gravitropism page, super specific and interesting.
 * So far reads neutral! No big claims that could be misinterpreted
 * Nope
 * Link are great, lots of great sources
 * If you link and reference these sources, they will be great and reliable!
 * Your sources are academic, one is from 1999 so maybe a little dated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spencer.Schulz (talk • contribs) 05:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments on first draft
Can't tell what part you are adding. Can you make a table of contents with a section just for the part you have written, so it can be peer-reviewed?

Jmmcabee (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)jmmcabee