User talk:Lfs147

Thunder Bay Transit
Do you have a source for the fleet? It's currently under peer review to eventually get Good or Featured article status, so everything must has a citation. The only sources I can find that list their fleet is from the late 90s. It doesn't have to be available online, it just has to be published somewhere, with a title and who wrote it, and perhaps where it could be accessed so that the content can be verified. Also, do you know if they're going to be restructuring the routes? They've been changing them almost daily lately, and having so many exceptions to the rule makes it difficult to include route information in the article. I have thought about creating a List of Thunder Bay Transit bus routes article, but they've made the system too complicated for it to be summed up efficiently. Generally, things like route schedules and even interlining schemes would be left out of the article, though I would like to keep them. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 00:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

We also need information for the infobox. The following fields are empty:


 * logo           =


 * logo_size      =


 * parent         = (I was thinking a city department might be it's parent? This might only apply to private intercity bus lines, I'm not sure. The template page doesn't explain the fields.)


 * stops          = Number of bus stops in the city, if that number is available. I'm guessing somewhere around 1200?


 * ceo            =

If any are wrong, please correct them. Thanks. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 05:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Other things needed: More citations for history, a citation for the thing about monthly passes allowed to be used by other family members if that's still going, and perhaps pictures of bus passes. I was thinking a monthly and a 20 ride pass. I'm not sure about the legality of scanning in passes, but we could do what they do with month and put a "SAMPLE" watermark on it. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 06:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Do you know where CPTDB got its information? A discussion board or wiki isn't a valid citable source. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 02:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

If you ever come back on this thing, I created a better chart for the bus routes here. I'd like someone to check them over. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 23:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:LED sign Brodie.JPG
You uploaded or restored, File:LED sign Brodie.JPG, but for various reasons did not add an information block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work: please include own in the relevant source field, amend the information added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:

Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or own, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log].

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:LED sign Brodie.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:LED sign Brodie.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)