User talk:Lg16spears/Archive 2

Unsourced claims (again)
Hello, it's me again. Please start citing your claims with a reliable source. As far as I'm aware, the idea that the Batman reboot will be titled The Batman is just a rumour at this point. Wiki policy requires us to cite our claims anyway. Thank you. DarkKnight2149 00:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations
I just noticed that you violated copyright rules multiple times on List of Gotham characters. I know I've mentioned uncited claims in the paste, but copying entire paragraphs word for word from something that isn't a direct quote is a much larger issue. You should be more careful, because it is very easy to get into trouble when copyright is involved.

Please read WP:COPYRIGHT, and stay safe! DarkKnight2149 01:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your recent edit to Star Wars
This evening, I opened a small discussion about the announcement of Ehrenreich and the Han Solo films on the Star Wars article talk page at Talk:Star Wars. I pinged you before, but I like to be sure and leave a talk page message as well. I previously removed the sentence for reasons I've outlined in that section, though I'm hesitating to remove it a third time because I don't want to rack up too many reverts in a short period of time, and because you added it back in, I thought you may want to participate in the discussion, if you feel it necessary. If you have any comments or questions about that particular piece of content, I suggest you head to the talk page. If you have any other kinds of questions unrelated to the Star Wars article, I do encourage you reach me at my user page. Thank you, and stay well! ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  23:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for copyright violations
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. MER-C 12:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC) As an editor of 18k edits and over ten years, you really should know better than to dump an IMDB plot summary into Wikipedia verbatim (see Baywatch: White Thunder at Glacier Bay). I am also deeply concerned about your non-communication with other editors, as borne out by the parlous state of this page. MER-C 12:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

{unblock | reason=All i'm asking is just give me a another chance, please remove the block on my page. I swear this will never happen again. Lg16spears (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)}

I have deliberately not set an expiry time -- you'll be unblocked if and when you show that you understand the reasons for the block (which you haven't, yet) and commit to making an effort to change. The unblock request immediately above this comment is not going to cut it. MER-C 02:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

I do have an uderstanding and very commit on the change. Can i please have the unblocked now, I promise it not gonna happen again. Lg16spears (talk) 03:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

{unblock|reason=I got block from Wikipedia for violations of copyrights, MER-C, could you please unblock me? Lg16spears (talk) 03:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)}
 * Please don't keep posting new unblock requests - only one is needed, and an admin will review it in due course. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * OK, thank you! But i still want to know when i'll be unblock? Lg16spears (talk) 13:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Calm down Lg16spears, one unblock request at a time, please. Once your current request is read, the admins will decide what to do. Kailash29792 (talk)  15:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you Kailash29792, I just a nervous wreck being block and not getting back into editing after seeing everyone's account getting block.Lg16spears (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: You have been told not to have multiple unblock requests open at the same time, and you even said "OK" in answer, so you are clearly aware of the message, and yet you have totally ignored it, and done the same again. Posting multiple unblock requests does not cause your request to be dealt with quicker, or make it any more likely that you will be unblocked. All it does is waste the time of the reviewing administrator, who has to close all of the requests, instead of just one. Likewise, as I have already said above, you have posted new unblock requests which ignore repeated requests to explain what you understand to be the reason for the block. Posting new unblock requests which do nothing to address issues raised concerning earlier ones, and which therefore have no chance at all of being accepted, again wastes administrators' time. Normally when I have declined an unblock request I leave that talk page and don't come back to it, but if for any reason I do come back here and see that you have yet again posted one or more unblock requests which totally ignore what you have already been told, I shall remove talk page access to avoid further waste of administrators' time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, I've been waiting patiently to be unblocked, I've say sorry many times and now know that learn my lesson. Lg16spears (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I've been waiting to be unblock for weeks now and I've read the policy of Wikipedia. I know what did because I didn't follow the rules, i didn't follow the procedure and I ignored all of the violations of copyrighting and it's policy. I'm sorry that I'm block, this never happen again, I'm asking for a another chance and I'm requesting to be unblock of my account.  MER-C, can I please be unblock so i can edited again, I promise you and everyone this is my mistake and it will never happen again. Lg16spears (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You need to make another appeal -- I'm still not convinced. You certainly haven't addressed all of my concerns. In particular, you haven't stated what you learned by reading the copyright policy and what you will (and won't) do in response. You have not addressed your lack of communication at all. I'd say you have one more shot at it before your ability to make further appeals gets revoked, so I suggest you read the above conversations and compose your appeal very carefully. MER-C 00:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

It may make it easier to compose your unblock request if you have a little guidance, so you might find it helpful to answer the following questions as evidence of your understanding: The answers can all be found at WP:COPYVIO and its related pages. Yunshui 雲 水 14:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) What licence is Wikipedia's content released under?
 * 2) What does this mean for people who want to reuse Wikipedia's content?
 * 3) How can you tell if text from somewhere else is released under this licence?
 * 4) Why is it a problem if you use text that has been released somewhere else under a different licence?
 * 5) When can text that has been released somewhere else be used on Wikipedia?
 * 6) When can images that have been released somewhere else be used on Wikipedia?
 * Yunshui I tired to get one, and nobody won't get my block out of my account. Lg16spears (talk) 04:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Peridon, I'm american and do speak and write in English, man. Lg16spears (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * My apologies, but I have concerns about understanding what you wrote above. I see a lot of non-native writers of English here, and that's what it looked like to me. Peridon (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You didn't read what I wrote -- "You need to make another appeal... You certainly haven't addressed all of my concerns. You have not addressed your lack of communication at all." Grovelling will get you nowhere; I am not impressed or persuaded by it. I'm going to defer to the judgment of an uninvolved administrator -- which means you need to make another unblock request. MER-C 05:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If i hadn't already responded to an earlier unblock request I would decline this. The answers you've given serve to convince me that not only haven't you understood the site's copyright policy, it seems highly unlikely that you've even read it. I would also suggest that any reviewing admin considers removing talkpage access as well; this talkpage has turned into a colossal waste of time. Yunshui 雲 水 09:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. MER-C 11:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 02:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

I think that you didn't do everything wrong, you deserve a second chance at getting your account back. If nobody can't do nothing about getting you back in, you need to stand up against those users who blocked you. 67.84.178.88 (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Move request
A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series). Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 01:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that due to repeated WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT appeals via UTRS and a continued failure to understand why they were blocked and, in the latest declined request, making the false claim that they were blocked because they were hacked, I have blocked Lg16spears from making further UTRS appeals for 6 months. The standard offer applies.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films based on works by Gardner Fox


A tag has been placed on Category:Films based on works by Gardner Fox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Crossover science fiction television series has been nominated for discussion
Category:Crossover science fiction television series, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Ghost Rider films has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ghost Rider films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 21:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:The Purge (film series) has been nominated for merging
Category:The Purge (film series) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Kickboxer films has been nominated for renaming
Category:Kickboxer films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 09:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)