User talk:Lg720/Kolami language

Hello Lg720, I've just completed my peer review of your article on the Kolami language. You write well, and you formatted your lead nicely. I can tell that your article will be quite good. My main concern while reviewing the article was that you did not include reference links to the sources that you used to gather your facts. I would also recommend adding URL's to the sources that you listed in your reference section, as well as make a separate bibliography section so that the references don't become jumbled together.

Overall, your writing was very well done, and the information was all relevant and unbiased. You maintained a very informative and encyclopedic tone throughout the lead. Best of luck with the rest of your project!

Final Review
Hi Lekhana, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article is reasonably well organized. 5 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: Most of the claims are backed by references to the scholarly literature. 5 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Nearly all of the information is relevant to the subject. 5 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 1886/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 29/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)