User talk:Lgallindo

Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Dune RPG's
Hello Mr. Gallindo!

Bem, quanto a um RPG de Dune eu nunca vi pessoalmente, mas sei que existe um livro de RPG chamado Dune: Chronicles of the Imperium. Nem sei como é o jogo, mas presumo que seja estilo "GURPS" ou "Dungeons & Dragons". Mas se você estava falando sobre jogos eletrônicos de RPG de Dune, infelizmente não há. Só há jogos de estratégia em tempo real. Você pode ver a lista dos jogos aqui.

Eu já joguei Dune (no Mega-CD e no PC), Dune II: Battle for Arrakis no Mega Drive e Dune 2000 do PlayStation. Já faz tempo, mas lembro que gostei de jogá-los, principalmente Dune II.

Falou! Agente Rolf (talk) 21:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neotemplarism


The article Neotemplarism has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced stub with little useful information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elonka 22:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Lgallindo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Andrei Toom -

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)