User talk:Lgonz498/sandbox

Roger peer Review
Great topic with a lot of ethnical issues because some people do not have an issue with insider trading but others do. You have good information for your article but the only thing missing is citations. I know you have not finished but you have a solid foundation on what you are going to add to the article. I do not see that you committed any grammatical errors. The only thing that is kind of confusing for me is where goes where in article because you start talking about the United States and then end up talking about how China does not send people to prison for insider trading.

Prof R Feedback
i like that you focused only on one section...that said, you should "complete" that section...the original article states that there was an arrest in 2015--you should tie that into your piece---clearly, China went from not giving insider trading importance to giving it enough importance to lead to an arrest...also proofread for spelling/grammar  Micalva (talk) 02:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)