User talk:Lhaktse1234

For Immediate Release                                             April 9, 2009

Tibetan Youth Congress Condemns Chinese Court's Foul Verdict China abuses the judiciary system to wrongly accuse and impartially trial and convict innocent Tibetan freedom fighters

Just twelve days after the Communist Chinese Government elaborately commemorated the so called 'emancipation of millions of Tibetan serfs', the state controlled Lhasa Municipal Intermediate People's Court passed down death sentences and life imprisonment to five Tibetans. This heinous act, exemplifying abuse of the judiciary with impunity, further underlines the Chinese communist government's fifty years of disparaging occupation of Tibet and its fatal ongoing policy of destroying the Tibetans as a race, culture and people.

Pertaining to last year's peaceful uprising of Tibetans against Chinese rule, the court accused Lobsang Gyaltsen of arson of two garment shops, killing a shop owner, and was sentenced to death. Loyak, was given the death penalty for his role in the burning of a motorcycle shop that killed three people and two employees. Two other Tibetans, Tenzin Phuntsok and Kangtsuk, have been given suspended death sentences with two year reprieve. Another Tibetan named Dawa Sangpo has been sentenced to life imprisonment.

The Tibetan Youth Congress (TYC) strongly condemns the highly biased and politically motivated verdict of the court and the judiciary system of China which purposely serves to meet the demands and wishes of the Chinese Communist Government and its policies. TYC maintains that the trial wasn't conducted in accordance with international law and standards which fundamentally gives the defendant the right to a fair trial and the right to chose an attorney.

TYC further argues that if Tibetans really enjoy basic rights inside Tibet as proclaimed by China, then the government, according to its so called regional ethnic autonomy law and policies, should be magnanimous enough to withdraw the court sentences and conduct the trial in a fair and open court with attorney of the defendant's choice and representatives either from independent human rights monitoring organizations or the United nations.

Since the occupation of Tibet in 1959, China has abused the judiciary system to wrongly accuse and impartially trial innocent Tibetan freedom fighters.

(See Tibetan original for details)

Issued by TYC Centrex Rangzen Regards Lhakpa Tsering Cultural Secretary Tibetan Youth Congress Central Executive Committee Dharamshala, HP India Off: +91-1892-221554 Cell: +91-9805283855 www.tibetanyouthcongress.

Speedy deletion nomination of Lhakpa Tsering


A tag has been placed on Lhakpa Tsering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 07:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)