User talk:Lhardenstone

CVD Equipment Corporation

Speedy deletion nomination of CVD Equipment Corporation
Hello Lhardenstone,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CVD Equipment Corporation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have moved the page to Draft:CVD Equipment Corporation as per your request. You now have time to work on it and provide sources to confirm its notability, if possible. DES (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Advice on Draft:CVD Equipment Corporation
I k now that you have not yet submitted Draft:CVD Equipment Corporation for review, and this is not a review. This is just some advice from a person who has been editing Wikipedia for some time about how things are most often done on company articles, in the hope it will save you time and effort, and lead to a better article.

The History section of a company article is normally one or more prose paragraphs, not a bulletted list.

Be very careful to avoid a promotional tone. The tone should be one of factual description, withe neither praise nor condemnation, unless an opinion is attributed to a named person in a cited, published comment. Remember that this is to be an encyclopedia article, not a company pamphlet. Phraseds such as "instant credibility", "further enhance", and "innovative" should generally be avoided.

When possible, cite statements to independent news reports, not press releases. Press releases can be cited for basic facts, but they do not contribute to notability, and excessive use of them is disfavored.

"Notable projects" should be ones which have actually been noted -- that is, covered in independent reliable publications. If the only source is a BuisnessWire press release (or a similar company provided source), think twice about including it, much less making it a sub-heading.

It is somewhat unusual to list individual patents. If they are actually significant to understanding the company as a whole, they can be mentioned, but they should be in running prose, not in a tabular format. Details such as the application number or patent number may be mentioned in a cited source, but do not normally belong in the article. Saying "The company potentiated a process for doing which increased it's revenues by " or "...which  wrote would have [Cite expert's statement]."

Do please read our notability guideline for businesses and organizations. I hope this advice will be helpful.

Draft:CVD Equipment Corporation concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CVD Equipment Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)