User talk:LiaJB

October 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Satanic ritual abuse. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Seduisant (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

My apologies that it read like personal commentary. My intent was to add information about the censorship. Could you please help me to phrase it in a neutral voice without excluding the information about censorship? Thank you --LiaJB (talk) 11:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Please let me know what constitutes appropriately neutral phrasing so that I can add the facts about censorship. Thank you. --LiaJB (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

I would like to have a reasonable discussion about the content on this page. Please contact me. Thank you. LiaJB (talk) 15:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Discuss the specifics of the page on talk:satanic ritual abuse but the source you tried to add, endritualabuse, is not a reliable source. In addition, since the majority of experts and scholars consider SRA a moral panic and essentially no mainstream sources take it seriously, the neutral way to deal with the subject is to reflect this fact.  In other words, we do not "tell both sides" if one side is not credible.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 10:59, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I read this book back in Grad School. I don't know if you can use it...
See http://www.amazon.com/Remembering-Satan-Tragic-Recovered-Memory/dp/0679755829 I don't know if you've used this, but it meets WP:RS in spades, I used it in the context of a graduate school history class on Witchcraft, of all things, looking at modern day analogues of witch scares. But it seemed salient given your question at The Teahouse that you were looking for good sources. -- Jayron  32  03:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jayron, Thank you, I will take a look at it. LiaJB (talk) 03:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)