User talk:Lia Palavandishvili

Nomination of Lordkipanidze Law of Economic Competition for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lordkipanidze Law of Economic Competition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lordkipanidze Law of Economic Competition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alæxis¿question? 11:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have restored the AfD message to the top of this article -please do not remove it again, that will not stop the deletion discussion. You are welcome to comment at Articles for deletion/Lordkipanidze Law of Economic Competition, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. The issue will be whether this subject meets Wikipedia's WP:Notability requirement, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Lordkipanidze Theory of Competitive Equilibrium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lordkipanidze Theory of Competitive Equilibrium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lordkipanidze Theory of Competitive Equilibrium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alæxis¿question? 11:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have also restored the AfD template to the top of this article; and I have moved the comments you wrote on the talk page of the deletion debate to the discussion page itself at Articles for deletion/Lordkipanidze Theory of Competitive Equilibrium, which is the right place for them. As with the other page, the issue for discussion is whether there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability for this theory. JohnCD (talk) 19:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Religious base of economic growth


A tag has been placed on Religious base of economic growth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EuroCarGT 10:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Religious base of economic growth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Supply


 * Revaz Lordkipanidze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Georgian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message
I pray for You sincerely and wish You all the best in 2018...

Nomination of Revaz Lordkipanidze for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revaz Lordkipanidze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Revaz Lordkipanidze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Revaz Lordkipanidze, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 08:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Revaz Lordkipanidze. Theroadislong (talk) 10:16, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Rather than blocking you, I will re-state you CANNOT remove the AFD tag from a page currently nominated for deletion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Please, excuse us, we did not know: we conducted essential revision and respectfully thought that it was possible to remove - we explained that we are always waiting for Your High opinions. LiaPalavandishvili (talk)
 * Please note that Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use only who is "we" ? Theroadislong (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Referencing
PLEASE read WP:REFB for help with referencing on Revaz Lordkipanidze the article is a huge mess of incorrectly formatted sources which makes it difficult to read. Theroadislong (talk) 12:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
We pray sincerely wish You only all the best to Wikipedia and all You permanently. If we had mistakes, we will improve our articles... Please help us to restore the page - we do not have such a recovery experience.