User talk:Liam74656

Ratings
Sorry it's taken me so long to get back to you. The ratings from Deadline can't be included because they include repeats. The number I've added is original episodes only. Jayy008 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

My bad. I thought you were talking about viewing figures. That number seems okay. Jayy008 (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Talk page
You should REALLY consider moving those ratings off your user talk page. You can move them into a WP:SANDBOX if you're ever going to work on them or use them in an article--but really, it shouldn't be here. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives 8x17
Hi. Apparently, the official title of the episode 17 is "Women and Death". About who dies, there is a picture (http://desperatephotos.net/albums/2011/Perso/tournages8/061.jpg), but of course this isn't really sure that Mike is the person who dies. Now, there's nothing official. But about the title I think it is. SecretStoryStyle 23:35, 23 February 2012 (CET)

UK ratings for Once Upon a Time season 2
First, I want to point out that you should avoid placing references in the section headings, between the == No refs here ==. And secondly, the ref doesn't really seem to reference anything in the table. Is it possible for you to directly link to the information? ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  14:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Your recent editing history at List of Castle episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Per WP:BRD, you are expected to refrain from reverting and edit warring while a discussion of disputed content is taking place. You have now made three reverts, and will be subject to blocking if you revert again. You should also review WP:VERIFY and WP:RS for advice on how to handle conflicting sources. We do not give preference to one favored source, but rather to the bulk of sources.

I notice you tend to have an aggressive style when writing edit summaries. You would be well advised to remember this is a collaborative project, and you do not dictate content to other editors, which you did in one edit summary related to this issue, and I've noted you've done a number of other times. Please review WP:CIVIL and remember cooperation is part of civility. --Drmargi (talk) 20:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Once Upon a Time
Your recent editing history at Once Upon a Time (season 1) and Once Upon a Time (season 2) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Per WP:BRD, you are expected to refrain from reverting and edit warring while a discussion of disputed content is taking place. You have now made three reverts, and will be subject to blocking if you revert again. You should also review WP:VERIFY and WP:RS for advice on how to handle conflicting sources. We do not give preference to one favored source, but rather to the bulk of sources.

I encourage you to start up a conversation about the Ratings tables you want to add on the article's talk pages. LiamNolan24 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=626604843 your edit] to The Good Wife (season 6) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * | 125 (6-03) || Dear God || 5 October 2014 ||  - || - || - || - || - || -

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Medium (TV series) into Medium (season 5). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 17:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I noticed that you recently removed content from Leave It to Beaver without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)