User talk:Liam alagh

Coles Myer
Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your recent contributions to the Coles Group article, however to avoid having two separate pages covering the same company it would be best if you only edit the Coles Myer article. I have reverted the Coles Group page back to a redirect to Coles Myer, but you can still access your past edits via that page's history should you wish to include them in that article. The Coles Myer page will be moved to Coles Group when the company name change is approved. Happy editing! --Richmeister 07:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop moving content from Coles Myer to Coles Group Limited. Moving pages by cutting and pasting content does not also move the page history, which can cause problems later on. Thanks. --Richmeister 08:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please don't add copyrighted material, such as whole newspaper articles, to articles. --Richmeister 08:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Article talk pages
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that notes about an article's Wikipedia page should be posted on the article's talk page, or even in the edit summary, but should not be included in the article itself. The article space is for the subject of the article. Maintenance related comments should go on the article's talk page. Please don't insert "No editing" and similar notes inside the article itself. Thank you. SWAdair 08:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Three Revert Rule
Please read Three Revert Rule. You have exceeded three reverts on the Coles Myer article. Please take time to read the appropriate policies. You are ignoring users who are trying to help and guide you. Please understand that we are trying to help you. You re-inserted "THIS PAGE WILL MOVE TO THE COLES GROUP PAGE AFTER SHAREHOLDERS MEETING" after you had read the note I left you above. Please remove that note from the article. Information about the company belongs in the article. Information about the Wikipedia page should not be placed in the article, but on the article's talk page. That comment is not about the company, but about the Wikipedia page. It does not belong in the article. Please remove that comment from the article. Feel free to post it on the article's talk page. I would do it for you, but that would put me in violation of the Three Revert Rule. Thank you. SWAdair 09:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding "THIS PAGE WILL MOVE TO THE COLES GROUP PAGE AFTER SHAREHOLDERS MEETING" to the Coles Myer article. As stated above, comments about the article itself belong on the talk page. --Richmeister 09:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright
Feedyourfeet 00:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Feedyourfeet 01:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Introducing deliberate factual errors
Please stop changing this page --Liam alagh 01:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC) Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at Coles Myer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Feedyourfeet 01:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Please Stop
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Coles Myer, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Feedyourfeet 01:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Coles Myer, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Feedyourfeet 01:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Richmeister 12:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Re message on my talk page
You wrote that section yourself? Please. I do know how to use Google to search for text that looks like it came from the Sydney Morning Herald. --Richmeister 07:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Johnfletcher_wideweb_470x264,0.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Johnfletcher_wideweb_470x264,0.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:May-Chidiac-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:May-Chidiac-1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Nav top.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nav top.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 08:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kyle_sandilands.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kyle_sandilands.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Opening Credit's.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Opening Credit's.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Please Use Edit Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Jmlk17 08:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:4244950459.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:4244950459.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

TV Caps
Per wiki guidelines -> "The problem is the images in question are not freely licensed, and Wikipedia policy does not allow nonfree images of living people, since it would be possible for freely licensed images of them to be made. They are considered "replaceable fair use" and are regularly deleted. Wikipedia does not use images by permission (since that permission does not extend to other, non-Wikipedia users), and policy is quite clear that images of living people must be freely licensed in almost all cases. A TV capture is not a free image." Strawbs77 03:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Please do not remove maintenance notices from articles, as you did to Sunrise (TV program), if the suggested changes are still needed. If you believe that the problems outlined in the maintenance template do not apply to the article, it may be best to discuss the issue on the talk page. Removing maintenance templates without good cause may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. – Se bi  ~ 05:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The semi-protection template
Just for future reference, you should bear in mind that adding the semi-protection template to an article doesn't actually semi-protect it automatically. What needs to happen is that an admin (such as yours truly or one of the other ones) needs to set the page that way. Then the template can be added and all will be well. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Opener update.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Opener update.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Title themorningshow 10.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Title themorningshow 10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Mark Ferguson (television presenter)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mark Ferguson (television presenter), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mark Ferguson (television presenter) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mark Ferguson (television presenter), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:0,10114,5192111,00.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:0,10114,5192111,00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mikecraig 22:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:0,10114,5192111,00.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:0,10114,5192111,00.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 20:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hmsml abb.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hmsml abb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)