User talk:Liambaker98

Council of the Republic of Belarus, National Assembly of Belarus images
Hi, /Users/liambaker/Downloads/svgfiles_2017-06-03-03-34-51-012351-10974814020690993279.svg is a local path on the own computer, all images need to be uploaded either locally to Wikipedia (and con only be used for that language) or to Wikimedia Commons. As a new editor you have to make a few edits and wait a few days before you can upload locally but for image you create or take yourself with no copyright issues you can already upload on Commons with the UploadWizard with the same account details (it may take a short while for the account to propagate but it should work soon). Once uploaded over there the image can instantly be used here in English Wikipedia. Hope that helps explain things. All the best KylieTastic (talk) 10:44, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Bundestag
Dear Liambaker98,

I have reverted your recent edit in the Bundestag article and wanted, to tell you the reasons: The diagram should do two things: It should show the political makeup of the parliament and the actual seating. The CDU and CSU are in fact two different parties, but in the Bundestag they join in one group (the CDU/CSU-group, often also called Union-group) and this is the only thing, which matters. I think, the word "party" (Partei) does not appear once in the standing rules of the Bundestag, at least not with respect to the actual MPs and the session-procedures. The FDP-group is seated between the CDU/CSU-group and the AfD-group (although they are not happy with this), this is simply a fact. The three independent members should also not be shown seated together, partly because that would be misleading (two of them are fomer AfD-members -> right-wing/conservative and one is a former SPD-member -> rather left-wing) and because that's not the way, they are actually seated. The two AfD-members are seated behind the AfD-group and the former SPD-member is seated behind the SPD-group.Alektor89 (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating 1961 South African presidential election.

User:Lefcentreright while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 16:37, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Senate of South Africa into 1910 South African Senate election. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

1960 Belgian Congo presidential election moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 1960 Belgian Congo presidential election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:1960 Belgian Congo presidential election concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1960 Belgian Congo presidential election, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1960 Belgian Congo presidential election (January 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1960 Belgian Congo presidential election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1960 Belgian Congo presidential election, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1960_Belgian_Congo_presidential_election Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Primefac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1960_Belgian_Congo_presidential_election reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1960 Belgian Congo presidential election


Hello, Liambaker98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1960 Belgian Congo presidential election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)