User talk:Liambishop12345

March 2015
Hello, I'm PhantomTech. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bin Weevils, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Phantom Tech (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bin Weevils with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Phantom Tech (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Bin Weevils. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Phantom Tech (talk) 21:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bin Weevils. Phantom Tech (talk) 21:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bin Weevils. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Snowager -Talk  21:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Snowager -Talk  21:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  21:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)