User talk:Liamlllively

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Bidgee (talk) 00:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

yer. No worries, i'll get on it. --Liamlllively (talk) 00:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. This also goes for edit summaries and not just article content. Bidgee (talk) 12:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Pseudomonas(talk) 12:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. continuing to add personal analysis, original (uncited) research and commentary at various hardware store articles -- VirtualSteve need admin support? 06:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:ChelseaheightsMega.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:ChelseaheightsMega.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  14:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Brands ect - Mitre 10
Woolworth's has been removed however I will not touch the US hardware articles as the fanbois will revert/re-add the content (and I'm really not in the mood to taken on the US editors [Trying to get them to follow policies is hard]). The only way it can be re-added is if it has historic importance, content describing the brands and Mitre 10 (has to be notable and encyclopaedic) but also needed to be written in a non-advertising way and also keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a directory. Bidgee (talk) 10:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ChelseaheightsMega.jpg


The file File:ChelseaheightsMega.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)