User talk:Liance/Archive 11

Page Rejected
Hi Liance,

The company page I created was rejected due to the History section being unsourced. That section is actual history of this family owned business and unfortunately, we are unaware of websites or sources talking about the history of Baesman. What do you suggest we do?

Thanks! B3green22 (talk) 16:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Station.com, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MMO. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Liance. Thank you for your work on PlanetSide. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   06:21, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PlanetSide Arena cover art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PlanetSide Arena cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

what it says im ur new mentor
help Book1234567890 (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Question from Vitaium on Assume good faith (00:41, 23 May 2023)
Hello ! How does Wikipedia identifies whether an edit is a good faith or bad faith? --Vitaium (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Greetings . Per WP:AGF, (quote) "Assuming good faith means assuming that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when their actions are harmful." It is up to each individual to decide whether an edit is as "good faith" or "bad faith" - generally, unless someone is carrying out deliberately harmful actions (vandalism, harassment, etc) most editors will assume they are not acting out of malice. Hope this helps. ~Liancetalk 19:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello Liance:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

John Oghalai
Hi! I see you are a member of WikiProject Medicine. I am seeking assistance in a matter regarding the page of Dr. John Oghalai. W12SW77 (talk) 03:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Mail2 world New Article Draft
Look I'm just a newbie trying to create new articles. You shouldn't be so mean as to reject my draft outright ! You could just accept the draft and let others who are more experienced than I am to improve on it ! Adrain72 (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello - Articles must meet the general notability guidelines before they can be accepted into the mainspace. I denied your submission, but did not reject your draft - meaning that you and others are welcome to continue improving it and resubmit at a later time. You can seek help from others at WP:TEAHOUSE or WP:AFCHD if you require additional assistance. Thanks, ~Liancetalk 23:55, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the edits
Thank you for incredibly fast responses. Notthereaper (talk) 01:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you for your comment on my draft article :)

Fewno (talk) 09:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC) 

Shuya Chang Draft
I am sorry, this Wikipedia article need nothing as I see. their is nothing to add or address or change the citation are reliable to me, but may be not! to you. Thank you105.113.26.50 (talk) 05:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ken Bone (activist)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ken Bone (activist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Of the universe -- Of the universe (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I have finished my review. The article is good, except for the fact that it calls Ken Bone an "activist" with no citation.  Do you know whether there are good sources that call him an activist?  If so, please add an inline citation.  If not, just change the short description and the lead to not have the word "activist," and then I'll finish up the review. Of the universe (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * - Thank you so much for performing the review. I apologize for the excessively late reply. It seems that I've made an error as I can't find any reliable sourcing for that detail - is the proper protocol to amend it now, or something else? Appreciate it. ~Liancetalk 19:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Actually, it seems that I can't read. Looks like my sleep deprivation's catching up to me! I'll make the change as requested. Thanks again! ~Liancetalk 19:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

My article on LangOps
Hi Lance, thank you for the insights on how to make my article better. I'm currently trying to reference as much as possible, but LangOps is a considerably new discipline in localization, as a result, we are lacking documentation on it and majority of information comes from blogs or articles, which might be considered unreputable? Creating a LangOps wikipedia page would be one of the first steps to creating a unified base of knowledge around this progressive discipline.

I would love it if you could help with specific pointers and which portions should I amend to make my article public again. I truly believe that this is for the benefit of localization industry and I'm encouraging experts from my field to contribute as much as possible.

Thank you in advance for your help to get this published again. Happy New Year!

Best, Didzis Didzisgrauss (talk) 22:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sans undertale.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sans undertale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ken Bone (activist)
The article Ken Bone (activist) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ken Bone (activist) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Of the universe -- Of the universe (talk) 23:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ken Bone (personality)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ken Bone (personality) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Of the universe -- Of the universe (talk) 00:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Help with article.
Hello, good evening hope everything is well and you're in good health. I am a little confused to why my article got denied. I really want this article to be approved so I am willing to work with you to fix the incorrections made on the draft. The Tower I wrote about is fairly new, as for information and sources it comes from different media outlets such as Jersey digs or Yimby. I did look at similar articles for reference it's just that some buildings have a lot of information, and some don't. What can I do to get approved? Gamezilla2019 (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Article denied
Hi there,

This is a bit old at this point but I took a little bit of a Wikipedia hiatus due to life circumstances, apologies on not messaging earlier. My draft article for Sundial was denied a few months ago and I was wondering if I could get some more clarity on what steps I should take to have it approved. The spotify links spam I understood and tried to remove, but I'm a bit confused about the comment regarding the reliability of the sources? I checked and it doesn't seem like any of the sources are blogs/user generated as far as I can tell, so I'm unsure of exactly which ones you were referring to here.

Thanks! Alphaw00lf2000 (talk) 08:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Liance
I want to ask you, are modifications and sources enough for Draft:Aleksandar Saša Trajkovski – Wikipedia (we added what you and your colleagues told me) to make a repeat submit?

Thank you. Shviki (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

"Wiimmfi" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiimmfi&redirect=no Wiimmfi] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 04:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ken Bone (personality)
The article Ken Bone (personality) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ken Bone (personality) for comments about the article, and Talk:Ken Bone (personality)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Of the universe -- Of the universe (talk) 01:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Tiffany Henyard
Would you consider re-reviewing Draft:Tiffany Henyard, which is again up for AFC? It's been awaiting review for some time now. SecretName101 (talk) 08:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Coalescent Mobile Robotics draft
Hey Liance, you've reviewed an article I've created one month ago and I would you to take a look again.

Thanks. Belem1999 (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

"Cocklass" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cocklass&redirect=no Cocklass] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:FLUFF" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:FLUFF&redirect=no Wikipedia:FLUFF] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined article
Hi, I see my article "Sharon Tettegah" was declined again and the general reason put was that it doesn't meet the minimum inline citation requirement. I'm not sure why. Could you please elaborate on what specifically is needed? Thank you! ST4603SB (talk) 00:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for reaching out. On Wikipedia biographies of living persons have specific requirements where all stated facts need to be backed up by an appropriate source (you can visit that page for more details) as I noted in a comment on your draft. Please add the necessary citations so that information about your subject can be verified before resubmitting. Thanks. ~Liancetalk 16:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

William Hammerton Smith
Thanks for the tip. I shall add more cited sources to the text as you suggest. Nigel PG Dale 08:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Liance. Thank you for your work on Npm left-pad incident. Another editor, Hilst, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

–  13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Request for Review of Revised Draft: Muntadher Saleh
Hi, I have revised the draft article on Muntadher Saleh following the guidelines provided in the Wikipedia:Spam policy, particularly addressing the issues related to promotional tone. The article has been rewritten to ensure a neutral and objective tone, focusing on verifiable facts and significant achievements without promotional language. I have also incorporated additional details and sources to enhance the article's credibility and comprehensiveness. I kindly request that you review the revised draft to determine if it meets Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability. If you find that there are still areas needing improvement, I would greatly appreciate your feedback and specific suggestions for further revisions. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards.

- 004bvan (talk) 11:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You need to resubmit your draft before it can be reviewed again (there is a "Resubmit" button at the top of the page). I usually do not do manual re-reviews for the sake of fairness, once you resubmit the draft it will automatically enter the draft queue and a reviewer will be able to pick it up. Thanks, ~Liancetalk 16:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Lifecycle Investing
Hi Liance,

I've never done a Wikipedia article before and I was hoping you could help guide me in regards to getting this draft from non approved to approved.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Joshua369krafchick (talk) 18:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey - have you taken a look at the message I left on your user page with the decline reasoning? Please let me know if there's anything specific you need help with. Thanks! ~Liancetalk 22:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Npm left-pad incident
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Npm left-pad incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 20:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

(Misplaced message)
Hi. thank you for your feedback on declining my article submission. You have said that some areas are not cited or referenced. Could you please point out which parts. I would appreciate any further help. kind regards Bio315 (talk) 01:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Moved message to new section Hi - on Wikipedia all facts need to be cited by a source for verifiability. There are specific requirements for biographies of living persons as I noted in the feedback left on your talk page. Specifically, the majority of the "Chess Career" and "Strength & Style" sections are almost entirely uncited and you should add inline citations to reliable sources whenever you state a fact about the subject. Hope this helps. ~Liancetalk 01:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Nicholas Devlin
Hi.

You declined my draft again. The article is about a notable Albertan judge. I haven’t added to much information as I don’t want to work on it a lot and then have it rejected again. I’ve changed and added references hopefully it will be acceptable now. Lisha2037 (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi - as noted in my feedback, at the time of your initial submission(s) that I declined the draft had only a primary source (the court's webpage) and a link to the subject' LinkedIn profile which is user generated content and not a reliable source. Seeing that the draft is properly supported by additional secondary sources and appears to be notable by WP:NJUDGE I will go ahead and accept the draft. In addition I would like to let you know that I declined your draft, not rejected it - a decline means the reviewer has provided feedback and you are encouraged to resolve the highlighted issues and resubmit. I hope this helps and thank you for your contributions! ~Liancetalk 01:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Princess Polly AfD
Hi Liance. I just wanted to let you know that I nominated an article that you recently approved at AfC, Princess Polly, for deletion, after a G11 CSD was declined. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 21:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looping me in - I accepted it because after a look on Google News I felt it comfortably passed NCORP and assumed other editors would add sources and improve the article. I'll let AfD have the final say though. ~Liancetalk 21:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC reviews
Hi. I saw your decline reasoning at Draft:Untitled Jurassic World Dominion Sequel, and I don't think "Currently, portions of this draft are unsourced" is appropriate reason to decline a draft at AfC. Per WP:AFCPURPOSE, "Articles that will probably survive a listing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion should be accepted." The draft, when you reviewed it, already contained enough reliable sources to establish notability. I think it should have been accepted, with citation needed tags added to the statements that needed them. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reaching out . I was under the impression that AfC was also responsible for ensuring that draft articles are able to meet verifiability requirements for mainspace articles prior to acceptance. For ex. in that draft, there was a large blockquote directly copied from an unknown source, and several paragraphs that were also entirely unsourced at the time of my review. Has there been consensus or a discussion about whether reviewers should or shouldn't decline in these situations? ~Liancetalk 22:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not a regular at AfC (I only check on pages that turn up on Inceptionbot's listings), so I'm afraid I can't answer your specific question. What I know comes from the written instructions, but it's possible that actual practice may have shifted (in which case either the instructions will need updating or the project will need to engage reviewers in some major re-orientation). WT:WikiProject Articles for creation might be the better place to ask. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Alright. In any case thank you for the heads up. I'll look into it further. ~Liancetalk 22:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Inquiry
What is lacking? I believe that this document satisfies the registration criteria because it contains numerous reliable media articles and original materials. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Help with draft please!
Hey Liance,

Hope you're well, I just saw your message on my talk page. I was hoping you could give me some help/advise with my Draft: Draft:Early Echoic Skills Assessment and Program Planner. Let me know where you think I can add/remove elements to help the page get approved. I've gone through the prior reviewers comments and added more references to this assessment protocol. Risinglms (talk) 01:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi - addressing the reviewers' comments is certainly a good start and will be the best thing you can do. I also see that you have done the proper paid editing disclosure which is also important. I would recommend reading WP:THREE and noting the best 3 sources on Draft talk:Early Echoic Skills Assessment and Program Planner, as well as leaving a comment for reviewers on the draft page itself letting them know that you have done so. That should help speed up the review process. Hope this helps. ~Liancetalk 18:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Simon Olivier English page
Hi Liance,

I added references after all the sentences that contain an explicit statement, as you requested for the last revision. It is a bit unfortunate that most sources are in Dutch, and that we could not find sources in English. Does this mean we cannot generate an English page? If so, how could we solve this?

Thanks! BA WURorc (talk) 08:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * On the English Wiki sources are not required to be in English at all, they can be in any language as long as they are reliable - I would add the best sources you can locate to establish notability regardless of which language they are in. The only requirement is that the body of the wiki article itself is written in English. ~Liancetalk 18:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Happy to read that my actions were in line with the requirements. Hopefully the page will be accepted soon. WURorc (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Liance, could you indicate when we can expect that the translation is accepted? Thanks. Bauke WURorc (talk) 09:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Request on 15:28:46, 30 May 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by AmitGuha
Thanks for your review comments. This biography was one of the deliverables for a Wikimedia project. I have submitted two other related drafts and both have been also rejected which is somewhat demoralising. The bar for accepting articles if quite high as it should be but it makes it hard for someone who is not a seasoned or regular contributor, I'm trying to understand the accepted best way to resolve the concerns before I resubmit this draft.

Will reducing the length of the article help? Is it acceptable to ask other seasoned editors to help with fixing the issues? Where can I ask for help? I realise Wikipedia is a volunteer organisation so it may not be reasonable to request others to help.

Also, I do not want to spend time trying to fix the article if it is unlikely to ever qualify to be a biography on Wikipedia.

Any help/guidance to a newbie is much appreciated. Thanks.

Amit Guha (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, I appreciate you reaching out. Writing new wiki articles is tough, I can absolutely understand the struggles you are facing. There are several immediate points of feedback I can point out - as noted earlier, the tone of Draft:George Michell is highly promotional - segments like "is a world authority", "played a pivotal role" should be reworded to be more neutral (see MOS:PUFFERY). Additionally you state several explicit facts about the subject such as how they receive several awards - in biographies of living persons we generally require a source for these statements to meet our verifiability policy.
 * I would thoroughly review WP:NBIO before continuing work on a subject's article. If you feel like the subject clearly meets the criteria - then yes, if the draft is suitable it will eventually be accepted into the encyclopedia, and is worth working on. A subject that does not meet the criteria however will not survive as an article. Your draft makes claims about the subject that could qualify them for notability but does not have the secondary, reliable sources with significant coverage to back them up at the moment. This would be the thing I would work on most if you want to pursue getting the draft accepted. I hope this helps. ~Liancetalk 18:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Somuah Emmanuel kofi on Freemasonry in Ghana (20:12, 31 May 2024)
I want to come please my number 0599833049 --Somuah Emmanuel kofi (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Sethjacob000 (08:34, 2 June 2024)
How can I created my talk --Nature (talk) 08:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! You can access your talk page at User talk:Sethjacob000 (another editor has already created it and added a welcome message). It should also be accessible from the user interface of the Wikipedia site/app when you are logged in. Hope this helps. ~Liancetalk 22:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Npm left-pad incident
The article Npm left-pad incident you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Npm left-pad incident for comments about the article, and Talk:Npm left-pad incident/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 17:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing the review ! ~Liancetalk 22:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Audius
Hi and thanks for your feedback on my Audius submission – I wasn't aware of that consensus on the cryptocurrency news outlets. I've replaced those citations with more reliable ones and resubmitted. PSPazW (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

IndexNow article declined
Thank you for reviewing my article revisions on IndexNow. We're unsure how to correct the issues, as our comparable subjects have very similar and fewer resources than we've provided. I have added a few articles from a strong authority in SEO. Comparable articles include Bing Webmaster Tools, Google Search Console and Sitemaps. I'm not sure if we're having trouble because we have been categorized with Math and Science? We are not math and science and cannot figure out how to remove that categorization. We would like to add the category search engine webmaster tools but not sure how. Any guidance you can provide will be helpful. Thank you! VWellsMicro (talk) 21:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi - articles on Wikipedia must meet the notability guidelines or they will not be accepted or be deleted. There is no way to get around this, you will have to find sources that demonstrate the subject's notability per the criteria. You can expedite the review process by identifying the WP:THREE best sources per the criteria at WP:GNG and comment these for reviewers. You will also need to address the multiple comments reviewers have already left. The categorization of a draft does not make a difference. It's true that other articles exist but these presumably meet the criteria, otherwise they would have been or will be eventually deleted.
 * In addition, could you please clarify what "we" refers to in your message? If you are being paid to edit by an employer you will need to follow the paid editing disclosure procedure or risk being banned by an administrator. I am not an admin but I just wanted to make you aware. Best, ~Liancetalk 19:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Mr Masher38 (12:45, 5 June 2024)
Hi. I recently made a correction to a wikipedia page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilly_Gilly_Ossenfeffer_Katzenellen_Bogen_by_the_Sea  (my first ever Wiki edit) but someone almost immediately reverted it. I am 100% sure my correction was, er... correct, as I actually listened to the episode beforehand to make sure. Have I made a faux pas in perhaps not informing the original editor, or should I have included some sort of citation: *I listened to it"? Would appreciate a bit of guidance, in case there is some editing etiquette I am missing. Thanks. --Mr Masher38 (talk) 12:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey, apologies for the late reply. I see you've reached out to the reverting editor which is always a good first step. Based on that interaction, I'm going to assume the reason for the reversion was that you did not provide an inline citation to back up the statement you changed, since it's required on Wikipedia so that all statements are verifiable. In addition, you linked to a disambiguation page instead of a target article. I would try to find a source that can back up the statement you want to change, and cite it right after the sentence. Let me know if you have any more questions. Best, ~Liancetalk 19:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Liance. Having read through your reply and that of the reverting editor, I think you are probably correct in that I should have provided some evidence to back up my change before I submitted it.  I'll put that down to a newbie's mistake.  I have since provided the reverting editor with a link to a youtube video which clearly shows the reason for my editorial change and I shall leave it to him, as to whether he wishes to correct the article himself.  Thank you for your time and the explanation. Cheers, Mark. Mr Masher38 (talk) 13:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Eric Preneur (Ep) (17:55, 6 June 2024)
Can you help me edit my wiki page to a professional one? --Eric Preneur (Ep) (talk) 17:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * EP's attempts at autobiography have been reverted (converting an existing article into an article about him) and Speedy deleted (his User page). David notMD (talk) 10:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Npm left-pad incident
Z1720 (talk) 00:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)