User talk:Liandrei/2010

War of 1812
You've put a section about the Battle of Stuart's Pond in the article, do you have any back up for this battle taking place whatsoever? Tirronan (talk) 03:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

ko@wiki user page.
I think you had been used translator. The grammar is wrong I wish that you change the 안녕하세요. 내 기본 프로필의 영어 위키백과에있습니다. to 안녕하세요. 저의 기본 프로필은 영어 위키백과에 있습니다. Thanks. :) -- User:Bart0278 ( talk  ·  cont. ) 10:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Coax cable image
Hello. You recently replaced the thumbnail image on the coaxial cable page, changing it from a PNG to a JPG. I'm not complaining, I'm just wondering why? Maybe there is something about the inner working of Wikimedia I'm not aware of. Thanks. GyroMagician (talk) 11:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with György Petri
Thanks for your help with the picture for that article and for adding his works to the year-in-poetry pages. There's no way you would have known this, and it isn't a big deal, but I try to limit the country subsection headings to those countries where we have at least three works on the year page. If not, I put works from other countries in the "Other languages" sections. I haven't always been consistant with that, and what you did won't do any harm unless the same type of thing happens again and again, with editors making one-item subsections for all sorts of countries. That's extremely unlikely, but I mention this just in case you want to add more in the future to those pages (which would be great). (None of this has ever been put to a consensus, so there's nothing even wrong with what you did -- I'm just making a suggestion.) Thanks again, JohnWBarber (talk) 15:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Assandun-sign.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Assandun-sign.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sli ready.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sli ready.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1st Armoured Div UK logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:1st Armoured Div UK logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

superseded non-free SVGs
Hi! A small suggestion: nominate superseded non-free files for deletion with db-f5 right away, rather than using vva (as on File:National Socialist Dutch Workers Party logo.png). Such images will have to be deleted anyway, sooner or later. —Quibik (talk) 12:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi cheers, yeah I'll defiantly do that from now on, I didn't think that once the SG version replaced the non-free raster ones would need to be deleted, thanks for pointing that out to me, cant believe I didn't notice!  Fallschirmjäger 11:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Graphic Lab/Photography workshop
I've rebundled these, and welcome your expertise, thank you! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 00:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've finished working on those 3 images, if they aren't quite right or need adjusting let me know!  Fallschirmjäger 15:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * They are great improvements, thank you! I will mark them as done, however, can you trim down the new blank space around them? You rock! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 01:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Will do, no problem ;)  Fallschirmjäger 08:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rex Mundi (music artist)
A tag has been placed on Rex Mundi (music artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

19th century Icelandic standard
Fallschirmjäger,

I saw your request at the Illustration workshop about File:Gunnfáni.svg and couldn't help notice that flag is near identical to the Saint Patrick's saltire. On List of flags of Iceland this standard is described as the "Standard of the Vestmannaeyjar Battalion" Vestmannaeyjar itself is an island named after Irish slaves (a "Westman" being the Norse word for an Irishman).

We are always on the lookout for more details on Saint Patrick's saltire, which has a shadowy history in Ireland itself. If you have any more details on this or ideas of places I could go for more details, I would be very grateful.

Regards, --RA (talk) 09:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi RA, thanks for the info, I had no idea the flags were so similar! There does indeed seem to be a link with Vestmannaeyjar and Ireland, for them both to have the same symbol. Unfortunately I can't tell you any more on the topic, I'm interested in the history of Iceland but as of yet I've not come across any further evidence as to support the origins of the saltire.


 * As for places to look for more information, I've dug around my university's vast library of material and couldn't find anything that isn't already sourced in the Saint Patrick's saltire article. I wish I could be of more use and shed more light on its history, if I come across anything in the future I'll be sure to let you know, but thanks again.  Fallschirmjäger 13:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for taking a look. The coincidence at least did lead me to a source a reference for a etymology of the word "Ireland" that I had suspected but never seen a reference for: the Irish word for west is iarthar, the adjective of which is thiar (pronounced something mid-way between ear and air in English). An etymology of Ireland is thus thiar-land, "west land". --RA (talk) 13:36, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Happy Fallschirmjäger's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Your talk page layout
Regarding the tag at the bottom of your talk page, I'd mention that it is not necessary – MediaWiki takes care of closing open divs. (I already removed it to demonstrate this, I hope you don't mind). Have a happy Fallschirmjäger's day! :) —Quibik (talk) 10:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for that! I didn't notice, I'm always rather sloppy with my html.  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 20:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Al-Ali tribe
Hello..I am a member of Al-Ali tribe, and have removed incorrect information from the page of this tribe. Why has it been undone back to the wrong information?Wm2252 (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Clean-up of Yale diploma
Hello, and many thanks for taking the time to clean up the 1902 Yale diploma. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, no problem whatsoever ;). Is it ok as it is or would you like me to remove the shadows and whitespace around the edges, I didn't want to change a historic document too much!  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 22:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello again, and thanks for asking. I think the document looks fine as is, and I agree with you that historic documents should be left pretty 'unretouched.' Thanks again for your help. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:16, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Watermarks on oil paintings
Thanks for your help with the diploma, and I hope I'm not out-of-line asking for your opinion about this image. I uploaded it from a commercial site, which I hardly ever do. Are watermarks like this removable? Thanks again. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course not, I welcome your question. Its fine from a commerical site, I too am guilty of doing the same every now and then, there is no problem with it as the paintings copyright has expired ;). That type of watermark is rather tricky but I would say it is possible to remove yes, I've certainly attempted much worse ones than that. I'll have a go at it today.  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 09:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Ok I've uploaded a new version with the watermark removed, how does it look?  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 12:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That looks superb. Many thanks. I also noticed you added an infobox tot the James Ward entry. Great work all around. :-) Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 16:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, glad I could help. If there is anything I can help with in the future just let me know. Regards  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 17:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Black & White
On the Pokemon video game articles, only one of the two initial versions' box art is used in the infobox, and it is always the first named version (Red, Gold, Ruby, FireRed, Diamond, HeartGold). The other articles don't even include the boxart for the 3rd versions. That is why I have put the White version boxart up for deletion. Because we only ever have one version.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 13:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok no problem I understand, thank you for the notice.  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 14:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Severe weather montage.jpg
Thank you for creating File:Severe weather montage.jpg, one thing you should always do is source the images used and license the montage under the what ever image has the strictest licensing (One image you used was Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5). It is always best to use the same licensed images to use in montage as you don't have the confusion as what happened with File:Severe weather montage.jpg. Bidgee (talk) 06:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok no problem, thanks for the notice. I did consider at the time whether any such actions were needed but couldn't find any info on how to license montages of images, many thanks for the advice. By the way I've added the source for the last picture that was lacking one. Regards,  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 09:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scout Association of Malawi flag.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Scout Association of Malawi flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Eligibility to vote
Thanks for your hard work. In case you were unaware, you are eligible to vote at Featured picture candidates/Ernest Hemingway in Milan 1918 retouched by saying whether you Support or Oppose the image's promotion to WP:FP in accordance with the standards at WP:WIAFP.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. I wasn't aware that I could vote, so many thanks for informing me. Regards  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 14:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Most photographers and editors of images are unaware, so I often inform them. Just familiarize yourself with the criteria at WP:WIAFP because in addition to technical standards, its encyclopedic value is a major issue.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Wesley Clark
Given your involvement in the recent FPC, I thought I would alert you to Valued picture candidates/Wesley Clark.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Cologne Cathedral
Can I just ask why you dropped in a beautiful panorama in an appropriate place, and then removed it again, as soon as I tidied up and removed a different image that had been rendered redundant? Is there a problem with the panorama? Amandajm (talk) 13:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No there is no problem with it, infact it is currently being nominated as a featured picture candidate here. It wasn't my desire to remove the image but discussions over at WP:FPC debated the encyclopedic value of the image in the article. There is conflicting views, one opinion expressed is that the image should be included in all relevant articles where a significant structure appears in the panorama, hence why it was included in the first place. While another view states that it's a very nice image but was believed to not warrant signifcant value in terms of the cathedral article which therefore resulted in its removal. Make your own judgement, the more opinions on the matter the better, if you feel the image deserves a place then do as you see fit. Regards   Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 13:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to the Novels WikiProject
Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books, often referred to as "novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including WikiProject Novels announcements there. While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox   .
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * Planning on starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the coordinators or an experienced member of the project; we will be happy to assist in any way we can. Again, welcome, and we look forward to seeing you around! — Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  06:49, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Fox on the Rhine
thanks on putting the cover. If you can find one for Fox at the Front...a hearty Ausgezeichnet! to you.--Eaglestorm (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Kein Problem! I've added the cover to Fox at the front as well. ;)  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 14:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

VPC
— raeky  T  11:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Attana logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Attana logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Busterkeaton.jpg
Thanks a lot for your efforts, but as this is a current FP, I have reverted your upload of the edit. Could you possibly upload it separately, then I can start a formal delist/replace request? Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 10:33, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I understand and should have realised this before uploading over the original. I've uploaded the new version under a new filename of File:Busterkeaton_edit.jpg. Cheers.  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 11:35, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks- nominated as a delist and replace here. J Milburn (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Imperfect Love
Hello. This is just a friendly notice that I changed the CSD tag you placed on this article from A7 (which books don't fit into) to the more appropriate G11 criteria. Whose Your Guy (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok cheers for informing me and replacing with the more suitable tag. Thanks,  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 18:55, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Regards, Rock drum Ba-dumCrash (Review me) 09:21, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

replacing
I see that you work in the Graphic Lab/Photography workshop. Among actual top 4 requests there's one that's not worth working on it (deleting the watermark = recontructing the back of the ship). I think it would be easier to replace the actual photo with one we could get from this page. New one hasn't got any watermark and it would be in higher resolution. The only problem is I don't know how to get the permission (maybe someone has already got one but I don't know where to find it) and I have never tried to get one before. There's another problem, my Enlish sucks really. Could you please help me? Thanks. Vearthy (talk) 22:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your efforts in the graphics lab. It seems that Quibik has already worked on the image but the version you have found is of higher quality so replacing it would indeed be ideal. I will look into trying to find a way of obtaining the image. Oh and by the way your English is very good! Regards  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 08:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Michael Atilano
Hi Fallschirmjäger, did you recently  CSD  tag this page? Please check to  see what's happened. Cheers.--Kudpung (talk) 16:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for SS Doric (1883)
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 06:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

AGF
Hi - you just posted a speedy deletion nomination on my talk page, and referenced A7. A7 clearly states "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. " My article does this quite obviously - could you explain why you nominated it? I know that this is a problem that a lot of people mis-nominate articles; is that what happened here? Tduk (talk) 19:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I nominated the article because its fails to satisfy the criteria of CSD A7. Thank your for your contributions to wikipedia but unfortunately at this stage I'm afraid your article doesn't "quite obviously" explain why the band are notable. They may have gained media coverage but why? What makes the band so significant from all the other bands out there, have they won any awards or been featured on prominant radio shows or any other kind of signifcant coverage? If you added some detail to make the bands significance obvious then it would certainly have a place on Wikipedia. Your first reference on the page reverbnation.com doesn't support the claim of "significant media coverage" as this is just a site for amateur bands to post a profile, it isn't a credible media source but your NY Daily News reference is certainly a worthy source but that article only explains about the bands style, not why they are an important band. As a side note, I also agree with Whose Your Guy's views at the article's discussion page. Regards,   Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 10:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Graphic Lab/Illustration Workshop Top 4
Hi, from what I can see, you're usually the person who updates the Top 4 images needing work at the Graphic Lab. I was just wondering firstly whether only specific people are allowed to do this? If anyone can, then:
 * what are the criteria for picking new images?
 * do the uploaded images need to be checked, with links made to pages/templates updated etc?

I ask because I've been getting involved recently and have sometimes finished the group. At this point, I could refresh it with new images for others to get involved in...but don't want to wade in without knowing protocol!

Thanks, Serenthia  19:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey! No of course not anyone can, feel free to contribute ;). Thanks for yor interest and efforts towards the project. I'm just usually the one who gets round to updating it most often.


 * There isn't any set criteria that we go by but generally as a rule of thumb try to pick new images that are already being used in an article or ones that are used a fair amount on other projects. If you're getting images for the illustration workshop my first port of call usually is Commons:Category:Images that should use vector graphics and from this I try and choose a mixture of image types. However if you come across any image in a article that could use vectorizing then use that if you want.


 * With regards to picking images there is a few things to keep in mind:
 * Firstly make sure the file is properly licensed and ok to work on (basically not copyrighted). Non-free files can be worked on in normal requests in the lab but only using the GLNF template but unfortunately this doesn't work with the top 4 template so stick to free files.
 * Make sure that the request is reasonable and won't take a excessive amount of work.
 * Ensure that the image can actually be vectorised.


 * Also before changing the current top 4, wait till they have all been completed or until they have been displayed for over 2 days, whichever occurs first. Then proceed to archive them before adding your 4 new files.


 * When a file has been completed first check the request has been fulfilled properly. Next check that the new SVG is used to replace the old bitmap version that is used in any articles. Also add a vva template to the bitmap file and remove the convert to svg template if it has one.


 * Hopefully I answered most of your questions but if not please don't hesitate to ask! Regards,  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 20:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * That's really helpful - thanks! I carry out all those checks on files I upload anyway (in fact, just spent a while going back through all of them to make sure everything's been covered - I'm very particular!)  You might start to see some tentative updates from me....please do let me know if I get anything wrong :o)  Serenthia  21:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Metro 2033 russian book front cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Metro 2033 russian book front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Birmingham City F.C. old logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Birmingham City F.C. old logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  01:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Uefa Euro 2012 logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Uefa Euro 2012 logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Club Atlas de Guadalajara logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Club Atlas de Guadalajara logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Lieutenant and Ensign collar devices rendered in a wrongly position
Thank you very much! their height just need to be lowered at the same "capitain" version because if you check here they appear higher than the other ones! Thank you again. --Nicola Romani (talk) 11:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I've fixed all of them now, including the other navy ones. :)  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 20:55, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Great job! thank you very much! --Nicola Romani (talk) 21:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Portsmouth F.C. logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Portsmouth F.C. logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Airtel logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Airtel logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

The December 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive Needs Your Help!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wikiproject Wikify at 01:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC).

Top 4 requests
Hi,

Could you please add Graphic Lab/Photography workshop to the top 4 instead of having two pairs of the same image for watermark removal, as every top 4 request since I can remember is for watermark removal, watermark removal, watermark removal. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  21:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I've added it to the top 4. The reason the top 4 is always watermark removals is because they are meant to be quick requests that can all be completed within 48 hours and there is a backlog of 8,000+ files with watermarks alone and are not normal requests, their purpose is to be filled with such files. The Maxin Gorky image will require a significant amount of time to work on and therefore images like this aren't normally used in the top 4 but since its been left stale for some time hopefully it will have more attention paid to it there. Regards,   Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 21:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah. Makes sense, but (in my opinion at least) you should also try to grab items that look like they are going stale. Gives them a better shot of being noticed instead of forgotten. Cheers. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  22:05, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

It would be great if the top 4 were updated after all of the goals are fulfilled. If it's not done in 48 hour shouldn't we wait a bit longer? That's just wrong putting in archive undone requests. Vearthy (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed but waiting for one file which gets ignored because it requires a large amount of work holds up the top 4, which is efficient at working through a backlog of simpler requests. I always leave the top 4 for a resonable duration, if I perceive a file has a good chance of being worked on I will leave it over 48 hours, which is no hard fast rule. However as was the case with the Maxim Gorky image it would require several hours of work and therefore very few wikigraphists, out of the few that are regularly active, will be willing to work on it. Many people who contribute to the top 4 only do so because requests are easy and quick and don't always work on the regular requests. I know its not good to put unfulfilled requests into the archive so in future I think all top 4 requests should be simple so they have a good chance of being done, things that will take longer are best left for the normal procedure of request posting.   Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 19:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Why did you listen to Florydian then? In such situation I think it's better to replace harder task with something easier. Vearthy (talk) 22:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I agree and in future I shall stick to the normal working procedure. I merely wished to politely fulfill Floydian's request, which perhaps I should have given more consideration as I didn't realise how much work was needed on the image and moved it to the top 4 without realising this. Regards,  Fallschirmjäger   &#9993; 22:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You did that again... Couldn't you fulfill the request yourself? Just throwing it away to archives doesn't make any sense... Vearthy (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Only because it had been left for over 3 days and it was purposely left because it is more challenging. I realise it is not ideal but it's no different really to normal requests which go stale and then being archived. Unfortunately it can't be left there forever as that one file is holding up the backlog of 8,000 files and growing, so there has to come a point to move on. Plus it isn't just me that has done this, if you look through the archives of the top 4 since it started other users followed the same practice. Plus most of the time all requests are completed, its only rarely that one is left. If you disagree feel free to voice your opinion on the top 4's talkpage where it will receive more feedback. Regards,<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#4D5D53">Fallschirm</b><b style="color:#2E8B57">jäger</b><b style="color:#701"></b></i> <b style="color:#3CB371">&#9993;</b> 21:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Please update data here after giving new tasks. Vearthy (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)