User talk:Liangdanica/new sandbox

Exercise 12: Polish your work Through extensive research, I've been improving the Wikipedia page that I am working on. I've been diving into Lovins' background, teaching career, industry career, and her personal life. Something fascinating that I found was that her brother (Amory Lovins) has an extremely extensive Wikipedia and his page even links to his sister's page. On the other hand, Lovins has a very sparse page, and it took some digging to even uncover that she had a brother who is famous and very accomplished as well! I'm going to try to flesh out as much as I can in these sections, and then dive deeper into the specific research that she is most famous in. So far, I have found out a lot about her family, her educational background, her time teaching and researching in Japan, her work in consulting, and her personal life as well (her husband is also an amazing individual!). I hope to find more about her work in industry as a software engineer, and examine her algorithm more in-depth.Liangdanica (talk) 05:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Responding to Peer Reviews: I agree with my peer reviewers that more work can be done in describing her work (and through that, communicating why she is significant) as well as her personal life. I plan to talk more about her work in teaching, her work in industry, and also dedicate a good chunk to the algorithm that she is most famous for. I also would like to talk more about her interests and hobbies, especially because she was an extremely active community member. These will be my focuses while moving forward! Liangdanica (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

This is what I want to accomplish by 12/6:

I will do this when I finish with the remaining sections. I will sum up the main points and write up a concise first sentence that summarizes my person's significance.
 * Improve and add onto the Lead Section

There is currently only one main section (Biography). I would like to add more sections like teaching and work, research, and personal life. I will do research and find information on these topics, making sure to also find good sources and cite them appropriately.
 * Add new sections

Liangdanica (talk) 06:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Bailey's Peer Review
Overall this is a good article. It maintains a neutral tone and gives you a glimpse into who Julie Beth is. It would be nice if there was an added section with Julie Lovins accomplishments to give readers a better idea of why she is such a notable women. A section on her personal life might help to explain why she chose to get into her field, but I know in class we have discussed that personal sections can be problematic. Great work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BaileyArthur475 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

jahi's peer review
I think the article does an ok job at describing who she is however there is very little information about her life and work. Because of that i would probably suggest expanding on the biography section and maybe adding information about her discovery and work. I found the same problem in my article so i plan on providing lots of info about the inventions and career.