User talk:Libatius/Archive 1

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Libatius,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.1 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that unfortunately you do not meet our 250 mainspace edit minimum. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

-  Gl e  n   TC (Stollery)  12:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism revert
No problem &mdash; ßottesiηi  Tell me what's up 21:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Aberforth/barman in LV article
Hey, I know that I've always been in a camp by myself, but I've never been convinced by JK's somewhat roundabout answer there on her site (at the Edinburgh Book Festival). However, I know I shouldn't bother to be so stingy about it, so I'll let it live as if he is the barman. I'm sure we'll find out in OOP/f as Aberforth is cast. Thanks, and see you around. --Fbv65 e del / &#9745;t / &#9755;c || 19:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I suppose the "well, yes, obviously" is what makes it true. If she hadn't said that, I still wouldn't be convinced. She's just so trickly! :-) --Fbv65 e del / &#9745;t / &#9755;c || 22:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Signature
Your signature points to User:Example instead of User:Libatius. Is that intentional or a mistake? -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  17:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)