User talk:Liberal92

The West Wing presidential election, 1998
Please model this article closer to The West Wing presidential election, 2002 or The West Wing presidential election, 2006...Thanks. The article has many problems as of now...see some of the links given to you in my welcome message above. Thanks for adding to our encyclopedia! Cheers,  the_ed 17  02:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Lou Dobbs
I reverted the edit you made to Lou Dobbs article because it was defamatory and unreferenced. Please make sure that you provide strong reliable sources to support such controversial claims. Docku Hi 16:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 21:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The West Wing presidential election, 1998
An article that you have been involved in editing, The West Wing presidential election, 1998, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/The West Wing presidential election, 1998. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Million_Moments (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Legislation
Thanks a lot for expanding the union legislation table! A suggestion: try using the Preview button, so you don't have to save and reload the page so often. Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 00:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

yes I agree with you Liberal92 about the map
Since civil unions are provided for New Jersians domestic partnerships should not be included now. Just have civil unions on the map. Regarding Connecticut, since same sex marriage is now legal, there might be a consitutional amendment to ban it (just like prop 8) in so-called liberal california (not so liberal after all hey), so I still agree of leaving stripes to show civil unions are still provided there. Note: Vermont is the most liberal, not California. And yes "I FULLY SUPPORT SSMs"!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.207.230 (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Merge of Raine Dog
Thank you for contributing information about Raine Dog. After some concerns were raised by Wikipedians about its notability as a new work, WikiProject Furry decided to merge the content to D.C. Simpson. GreenReaper (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Mexican States considering Civil Unions
Hello, would you mind giving me the link(s) for the civil union debates in the Mexican states you listed at the North American map? I want to update the Mexico SSM page and I want to include a source for the update. Thanks :) VoodooIsland (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! :) VoodooIsland (talk) 22:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I would if I knew how, but I've yet to learn how to do all the map updates. Luckily, the page is frequently checked so I'm sure it will be updated within a matter of hours. :) VoodooIsland (talk) 22:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:VoodooIsland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 00:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The West Wing presidential election, 1998
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The West Wing presidential election, 1998. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/The West Wing presidential election, 1998 (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Edit war on Wisconsin protest page
Please stop edit warring on 2011 Wisconsin budget protests. Discuss your difference on the article's talk page. I'm leaving the same message at User talk:S51438. Any further reversions and I will block you for violation of WP:3RR. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Username
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Liberal92) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because your username seems disruptive and may show that you have a POV problem. My apologies if someone else has asked you about it and it got resolved.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. NYyankees51 (talk) 14:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

My username is only disruptive if people choose to let it disrupt them that I am liberal. I'm identifying a quality about myself that I take pride in and I'm doing it in non-vulgar terms. I prefer to keep my username, thank you. Liberal92 (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Having your ideology in your username causes people to question your ability to have a WP:NPOV when editing. As someone with several userboxes on political/religious/moral issues, I speak from experience. I'm not doing this because I disagree with your ideology, I'm just saying it probably does more harm than good to you. NYyankees51 (talk) 02:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Yorkers United for Marriage


A tag has been placed on New Yorkers United for Marriage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T/S 04:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I will have an admin look at New Yorkers United for Marriage and decide what to do with it. You should also contest the speedy deletion on the articles talk page. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T/S 04:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Seeking consensus on when to edit File:Samesex marriage in USA.svg following new legislation/court-rulings
Hello, I have noticed you made edits on File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg and/or File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg/Archive 5, so I am contacting you to take part in a newly-formed discussion at File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg as for whether we should update the map directly when a new legislation or court-order hits the books or if we should wait until said action takes effect. Historically, we have been updating the map when the new legislation is signed (or veto overrode or won at the ballot box, etc.), and thus it can be inferred that the consensus is to update as soon as one of those occurs. A discussion has emerged in regards to whether we should begin updating from the effective date instead of from the date of signing/etc. If you have an opinion over this matter please post it at File_talk:Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg

Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Discussion on when to update File:Samesex marriage in USA.svg
Hello, there is a discussion here concerning when we should update this map (when a new law/court order/etc. is made or when it goes into effect). You are being contacted because you participated in a similar discussion a few months back. If you are interested, please stop by and leave your opinion. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 00:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Baltimore Orioles seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Fag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.101.121.104 (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

sorry for calling you a fag but
Your username is blatantly POV. How does anyone know you aren't on here to advance some left-wing agenda or make coverage of your side more favorable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.101.121.104 (talk) 21:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)