User talk:Liberalbsdetector

March 2018
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on InfoWars. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Removal of content on InfoWars
Hello,

While I am no InfoWars hater (plenty of their content I consider funny and they are definitely not always unreasonable), please don't remove well-sourced info like what you did on the InfoWars article. I am talking about the sentence "InfoWars, and in particular Alex Jones, advocate numerous conspiracy theories particularly around purported domestic false flag operations by the US Government (which they allege include the 9/11 attacks and Sandy Hook shootings)." This is well sourced. If you disagree and believe it should be removed, please see the talk page. I would also understand is this is a legitimate mistake (I have made such in the past). Thanks, trainsandtech (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)