User talk:Liberaldem71

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Sheep NotGoats  (Talk) 17:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Direct scientific
This is a relatively new company and I cannot find any articles written about it. It does exist though and I believe deserves a short article. I would like to remove two of the maintence stubs if possibe. Liberaldem71 talk)
 * I will try to help you out, but the maintenance tags are appropriate and, therefore, can remain for now. Also, please don't forget to sign your posts by typing four tildes. Shirulashem (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * After looking a little, I'm wondering if you feel that this company meets the notability guidelines. Please let me know if you think that it does, in which case I will continue to help. Otherwise, I'm afraid that it doesn't belong on Wikipedia and will probably get deleted. Shirulashem (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Let's bring this conversation to the talk page of the article. Please post all replies there. Shirulashem (talk) 18:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Direct Scientific
✅. I have verified part of the article, capitalized the article correctly, fixed the tone, and verified notability. What do you think?  TN P  (formerly Jonathan)  19:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

It looks great, Jonathan, thank you.
 * No prob! If you ever need help, feel free to drop me a line!  TN P  (formerly Jonathan)  20:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Direct Scientific
A tag has been placed on Direct Scientific, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 00:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Direct scientific
A tag has been placed on Direct scientific requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)