User talk:Libertarianboi

February 2020
Hello, I'm Jeff6045. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Law and Justice have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jeff6045 (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Black Front. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Black Front, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:2604:2000:F186:D300:6907:FD16:997B:637E


A tag has been placed on User:2604:2000:F186:D300:6907:FD16:997B:637E requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Test page, only content is 'Just seeing how this works.'"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 01:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Chinese Communist Party, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. intforce (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Seth Green—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me  • contribs) 22:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Clare Grant. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 22:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Seth Green, you may be blocked from editing. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 22:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * How is this disruptive? I have sources, including one, in which Mr. Green confirms it himself. You or whomever is deleting this indisputable fact, is the one being disruptive! Libertarianboi (talk) 22:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)