User talk:Liberty1012

January 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to We Must (Serbia), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Consider reading WP:REF, MOS:INFOBOX and WP:HIJACK. Thanks. Vacant0 (talk) 13:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to We Must (Serbia), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to We Must (Serbia). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Vacant0 (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Do not let Belgrade drown, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Do not let Belgrade drown. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Do not let Belgrade drown, you may be blocked from editing. Vacant0 (talk) 11:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * About my recent edits of the Do not let Belgrade drown page. I have to say that neither you, nor any other editor who had reverted my edits provided a reason for doing so. What do you mean by "not being constructive"? I just added information that's already mentioned in the page into the infobox. In one of your revisions, you stated that environmentalism is not an ideology, while even the actual Wikipedia article about environmentalism describes it as "a broad philosophy, ideology, and social movement regarding concerns for environmental protection...", something which I already cited in one of my previous contributions, for which neither you, nor the other editors who reverted my edits, provided any response. Another ideology that I added into the infobox, as the ideology of a faction in NDB is socialism, based on your edit from 28th of February 2022, 6:43 PM, where you mentioned that NDB "maintains a socialist faction", and cited an article from Portal Novosti as the source. So again, something which is already mentioned in the Do not let Belgrade drown page, but I just added it into the infobox too. If you see any problem in particular with this, please let me know, so that we could hopefully resolve this dispute. Thank you. Liberty1012 (talk) 19:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)