User talk:Libertylie

Welcome!

Hello, Libertylie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 09:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Polytechnic University of the Philippines College of Law
Hi there. I noticed that you nominated this for speedy deletion but I cannot understand the reasons you have done so. Do you mind letting me know (and if it was a mistake, do you mind removing the tag?) Thanks! Steven  Zhang  Help resolve disputes! 06:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Polytechnic University of the Philippines College of Education. JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polytechnic University of the Philippines Laboratory High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Good day Libertylie, my fellow Isko/Iska. The main point in summarizing and removing chunks of the article is that the section you tagged as "encyclopedic content" isn't encyclopedic at all, as it mostly has no references and are mere redundancy (or copied from the PUP Website). Wikipedia has rules, and we must follow it. As much as I want to say much about our Pamantasan, Wikipedia is not a place for promotion.

As for the Colleges you've added in the Template, refer to other templates such as those of UC Riverside where they did not include all of the colleges, but only those with Wikipedia article. But to avoid confusion, let us retain the all the colleges that was added back. Also, we don't need a list of officials for its administration section, only briefly explain how the school is governed and provide reliable sources.

As we vie for making PUP a Good Article, we must include references. Including the claim that PUP NDC is called as Rizal Campus, because as far as I know, Rizal Campus of PUP is in Sampaloc. The College of Engineering and CAFA doesn't even refer to that compound as Rizal Campus, nor does COC and ITECH. We will retain that info as sources are provided. We aren't even unsure of the count of student body, and it may be tagged as Original Research. Logos and symbols isn't encyclopedic. We don't need to add what Republic Act Governs PUP, it should be included in the State Universities and Colleges articles as all the state U are governed by the same Act. Also the source provided for Proclamation No. 482 (http://www.gov.ph/2003/10/06/proclamation-no-482-s-2003/) does not indicate that PUP was called as the National Comprehensive University, it only declared that October 1, 03-Oct 14, 2004 as the Centennial Year of PUP. There are many more flaws in the article, and hopefully, you can provide reliable references for them. As for now, many of these are considered as speculations and original research as no references are provided. We may discuss further changes on the talk page of PUP.

See you around fellow editor and Isko/Iska. God bless.

--PH 0447 (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of thePolytechnic University of the Philippines College of Political Science and Public Administration.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo of thePolytechnic University of the Philippines College of Political Science and Public Administration.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

PUP Manila System
You have blanked the page twice, so I reverted.Xx236 (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:National Museum PH logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:National Museum PH logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of the Philippines Manila Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:University of the Philippines Manila Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)