User talk:Libertyports

Dansynch
A "" template has been added to the article Dansynch, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Tiswas (t) 13:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've put the nominated the article for deletion (here). If you think that it should stay, please comment there - Tiswas (t) 15:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi there! I am one of the ones who voted delete, but I wanted to let you know that it is not at all personal!  If you take a look at WP:NEO, this will show you some of the reasons why we don't tend to have articles on new terms until they are widely accepted and third-party sources have reported on them.  Even if the article is deleted this time around, there is no reason that when and if the term gains prominence the article can be recreated.  If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to drop by my talk page!--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 16:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)