User talk:Libraa2019

Unspecified source/license for File:Thora Sa Haq.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Thora Sa Haq.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 09:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Areeka Haq for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Areeka Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Areeka Haq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hira Khan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hira Khan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jiggyziz Talk✍️ 14:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Abdullah Seja
Hello, Libraa2019,

Thank you for creating Abdullah Seja.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article needs more references to satisfy notability for biography of living persons. What is needed are references giving significant coverage about this person, and independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are reliable - WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. Pages of photographs, mentions of this person on pages about other topics do not garner notability. A more comprehensive guide is WP:BASIC ... People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Lack of attention to the above is likely to mean that the article may not be suitable for inclusion."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hira Khan
Hello, Libraa2019. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hira Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hira Khan


Hello, Libraa2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hira Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Mohammad Jerjees Seja moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mohammad Jerjees Seja, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Parhlo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parhlo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Parhlo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. CNMall41 (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Abu Aleeha image
You of this file when uploading to Commons and stated a permission email was sent. This indicates you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of that page. What is your relationship with that person? CNMall41 (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mohammad Jerjees Seja


A tag has been placed on Draft:Mohammad Jerjees Seja, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Abdullah Seja for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdullah Seja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abdullah Seja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 16:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Danial Afzal Khan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danial Afzal Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danial Afzal Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 16:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Qudsia Ali for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qudsia Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Qudsia Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 10:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Agha Mustafa Hassan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agha Mustafa Hassan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Agha Mustafa Hassan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 19:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Shah Sharabeel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shah Sharabeel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shah Sharabeel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 19:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Rishtay Biktay Hain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rishtay Biktay Hain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rishtay Biktay Hain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 23:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Look - I posted this here because I've observed you adding WP:OR as well sources that are clearly unreliable as citations on topics related to BLPs and Pakistan. It's important to remember that BLPs and Pakistan-related topics fall under WP:CTOPICS and editing in this area should be approached with care. --— Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC) I have never seen someone removed roles of an actor or ask for a source for a particular role. It was totally retaliation and what are doing currently at this BLP is also retaliation. May be you are preparing for second nomination thats why removing all stuff to appear more strong for the next time. BTW As i said earlier, i dont have energy to consume on you so i will not reply you anymore. Libraa2019 (talk) 18:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I noticed you're still slipping in that WP:OR stuff with those placeholder references. Just a heads up, if you keep doing that, I might have to report it. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 19:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please show me i dont think i have added OR since then? Libraa2019 (talk) 02:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Here. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 11:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Saqib, Kindly check properly before accusing another user, you can clearly check in provided diff, i only moved Film section from bottom to top because films were fewer than television. According to you, moving the sections is WP:OR or is this the new way of insulting me? Libraa2019 (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * And what about this? I had to delete all this content because it seemed like you were trying to slip in WP:OR using placeholder references. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 17:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You removed other basic info too in retaliation just because BLP was kept. Your edits at BLP after AFD closure says it all & i dont even have energy to argue with you thats why ignored it. BTW you posted about WP:OR on 15-May-24, do you any proof i have added OR after that? Libraa2019 (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * My removal makes sense because it was all just made-up stuff. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 17:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I reverted Saqib because what's stated in the lead passes WP:V. S0091 (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Pinky Ka Dulha for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pinky Ka Dulha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pinky Ka Dulha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 15:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Saqib, carry on, may be you can get some peace of mind by doing these. Libraa2019 (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Mehboob Aapke Qadmon Main for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehboob Aapke Qadmon Main is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mehboob Aapke Qadmon Main until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 15:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I can understand your situation Saqib, you dont want anyone to object your moves but unfortunately my articles received keep votes. Carry on, may be you can get some peace of mind. And i am not bother by the deletion of these articles which you are nominating as i am not UPE and neither fan of these TV dramas right now. Libraa2019 (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Don't take it the wrong way, okay? — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 16:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I did'nt & hope you get what you want by doing all these. If you want to make me upset then i am very much upset okay :) Libraa2019 (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Raja Ki Chandni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raja Ki Chandni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raja Ki Chandni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 17:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:TALK#REPLIED
Just a heads up. Once someone has responded to your comment, you shouldn't make major changes to it. Fixing typos is okay, but try to avoid making a lot of edits. I've noticed you've been doing this on multiple AfDs. Thanks! — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 12:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Did'nt knew it before. Will avoid such thing in future. Libraa2019 (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Addressing editors as sir
Hi Libraa2019, I know your intent is to be respectful but I suggest not referring to editors as sir unless you know they identify as male and prefer he/him type pronouns. You can look at their User page to see if they make it clear but for many editors, like me and you, their gender is not known. While personally I do not take offense if someone refers to me as sir, ma'am, he, she, etc. I have seen editors express great offense so best to be safe. I usually defer to they/them to be safe unless I know otherwise. S0091 (talk) 17:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Oops my mistake, You are right. This thing never came into my mind. Thanks for the guidance. Libraa2019 (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 20:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Abdullah Seja
Why do you keep removing those tags that point out unsourced content in the BLP? Got a reason for that? — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 14:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Will you care to provide diffs in which i removed this tag more than once? Why did you wrote "Keep removing those tags" as if i am removing continuously, or did you wrote it purposely? Libraa2019 (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * It's not just this BLP; I've noticed it on other articles too. Please do not remove tags unless the issues have been resolved or addressed on the relevant tp's. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 14:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Saqib, As i mentioned its only one case. Please provide diffs of other articles or else dont just accuse without evidence. You've noticed it on other articles too but failed to provide evidence. Is it so? Libraa2019 (talk) 15:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 20:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

UPE tags
Please stop removing the UPE tags from this page until my concerns are addressed. Given its history of creation by UPE sock farms, I strongly suspect this is another UPE. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 20:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Why do I have this inkling that you could be User:From14 ? — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 20:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * First Nauman something & now someone else. Feel free to report. I also have inkling that you may have a COI with Pets of Imran Khan and i can prove it too. Is it so? Libraa2019 (talk) 21:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, please feel free to report. I couldn't care less. Sheru is actually my buddy. —  Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 21:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Then you should thank me actually because i was not active in that days in which Imaan Mazari & this article faced AFD, because i have a habit of presenting my opinion with proper facts & evidences. Libraa2019 (talk) 21:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, I can see that. Well feel free to nominate them again for deletion. Who's stopping you, anyway? — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 21:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I mentioned about COI claims, as i don't have a habit of accusing others casually without any single evidence & when i do, i had a proper research in back. Libraa2019 (talk) 21:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you please show that I've a COI with Tenderd? — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 21:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Already provided my rationale at that AFD & you accepted at that time that you mentioned tenderd somewhere. Libraa2019 (talk) 22:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Please familiarize yourself with what COI actually entails. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 22:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You clearly admired tenderd in that platform. Besides, you too needs to familiarize youself with UPE tags and WP:AGF. Libraa2019 (talk) 22:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello Libraa2019. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Libraa2019. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 20:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC) This user continues to remove UPE tags from a page that was previously created multiple times by socks of Nauman335. Is this removal of tags even permitted? --— Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 21:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, the fact that you keep trying to remove UPE tag from the article. If someone isn't involved in UPE, they shouldn't even be concerned with that tag. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 21:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * After seeing how casually you add this tag to others talkpage, even on the talkpages of seniors too, i dont find the necessity to respond to your this query neither you are an admin to whom i respond on every query. Libraa2019 (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Why did you assume Captain Assassin! is a senior editor ? — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 21:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Why did you assume he is not? Libraa2019 (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I don't consider them a senior editor. By the way, you caught my attention today because you created an article on a topic that has previously been handled multiple times by UPE like . Therefore I hope I'm not mistaken in accusing this of being another UPE.<span id="Saqib:1721337876386:User_talkFTTCLNLibraa2019" class="FTTCmt"> — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 21:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Respected Ivanvector, I provided summary in my edit if it is objectionable then i dont have an issue of this tag being added in article as the article currently has notability & other tags which i never removed because i respect others opinion. Also i dont have an idea of this article being infested by sock as right now most of the Pakistani entertainment is infested by socks and i dont want to edit them and risk my reputation. One of the case is draft:Na Baligh Afraad as its a notable feature film  but it is heavily edited by socks thats why i never edited or moved it. Also, please check my history, Saqib has issue with my every edit & he frequently accused me of being a UPE without any evidence. Please check Saqib and my involvement at Articles for deletion/Waqar Zaka (3rd nomination) and this   Libraa2019 (talk) 21:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Because I'm not the only one who suspects you're part of Nauman335's sock farm. And the fact that you attempted to rescue articles created by UPEs as well.<span id="Saqib:1721340193328:User_talkFTTCLNLibraa2019" class="FTTCmt"> — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 22:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Other editors were on a good faith and never accused me after that SPI. You are harassing me since day one and even after that SPI you continued to tag my articles for paid editing, notability even nominated all of my articles and called my UPE/sock on multilple platforms. And i already provided clarification somewhere that i only participate in AFD which is initiated by you because it sometimes lacks WP:Before as noted by many,  . I will share proper evidences of harrasement if admin demands. Libraa2019 (talk) 22:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You are harassing me since day one You've been editing under this account since 2019; I don't even remember if we've interacted before May 2024. I will share proper evidences of harrasement if admin demands. Please do.<span id="Saqib:1721341248601:User_talkFTTCLNLibraa2019" class="FTTCmt"> — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 22:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * By day one, it means day one of that SPI & as i mentioned i will share if admin demands. One of the evidence is my talkpage where you accuse me on a regular basis., Libraa2019 (talk) 22:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I want to clarify one thing. Draft:Na Baligh Afraad was created by Umais Bin Sajjad who is not a sock or UPE. Saqib is engaged in draftying newly created Pakistani articles even if they are created by established editors and with a plenty of sources., , . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libraa2019 (talk • contribs)
 * Just curious how can you speak on behalf of other suspected UPE's? Anyway, I don't have much more to say here. If you believe my accusations lack merit, please feel free to report them. I typically only raise allegations when I have strong suspicions and I can provide many difs to demonstrate your editing behavior resembles that of a WP:PE.— Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 07:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * As usual you ignored what i said right now most of the Pakistani entertainment is infested by socks and i dont want to edit them and risk my reputation. One of the case is draft:Na Baligh Afraad as its a notable feature film but it is heavily edited by socks thats why i never edited or moved it. Captain Assasin, Umais Bin Sajjad & Beausuzanne are not a proved UPE but as i mentioned you are accusing others & using this term very casually. Besides, i have a feeling you dont want any other Pakistani editor here except yourself. One of the many example is this where you nominated around 26 Pakistani politician BLP's may be because another editor created these pages before you. And you are accusing me of resucing sock articles whereas i participated in many of these AFD's too   Libraa2019 (talk) 14:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Star  Mississippi  01:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Request for Article Creation
Hello!! I have noticed your interest in Pakistani television related articles. I'm here to request you an article about the new and currently on Air Pakistani Television series  Gentleman (Pakistani television series). It stars Humayun Saeed, Yumna Zaidi, Adnan Siddiqui, Ahmad Ali Butt, Zahid Ahmed (actor), Sohai Ali Abro and more actors and which aired on Green Entertainment . More Citations or Sources and reliable References are provided on the Internet. Please Create an article as the show is popular and Notable. Thank you 223.123.11.9 (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not here to entertain socks. Don't post such requests on my talkpage. FYI, from now i will not contribute to Pakistani entertainment specially articles which are infected by socks like you. Libraa2019 (talk) 12:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)