User talk:Liebes~enwiki

Speedy deletion of SnowCraft
A tag has been placed on SnowCraft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai  talk ♦ contribs 08:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

SnowCraft
You deleted my article while there was a posted "hangon" and while I was in the process of contesting the speedydeletion on the discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liebes (talk • contribs) 11:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I saw your message, but webgames must meets notability. I do not see or found independent sources to assert the notability, also your article has little content. It is hard to save. Carlosguitar 11:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I came to Wikipedia looking for information about Snowcraft's background because I play it every year around Christmas time, and much to my surprise, there was no entry. A Google search revealed this User talk page, where the posted rationale is that some Wikipedia editor can't find any information about it; has obviously never played the game; and therefore decides the game isn't "notable". As though we're working with a physical medium where number of pages might be a constraint. And said editor deleted with a hangon tag attached, using the argument that there's little information about the game. It was my understanding that Wikipedia was an encyclopedia by the people, for the people. Who cares if the original author isn't a Snowcraft expert. Framing the entry helps, because then someone else can come along and add to the entry what they know, repeat two or three times, and before you know it, you've got a full-fledged entry that's suddenly notable. Who knows. Maybe one of the developers at IconNicholson might even come along to see what people are saying about their creation, and they'll contribute their own material about the game's history and easter eggs (if there are any). But what do I know. I have only a small number of Wikipedia edits under my belt, and my Wikipedia penis is clearly smaller than yours.

Fair use rationale for Image:Snowcraft.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Snowcraft.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Carlosguitar 11:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Snowcraft.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Snowcraft.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Liebes. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Liebes~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)