User talk:Lierone

Welcome!

Hello, Lierone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

TEΦ
Thank you for being Bold, albeit a little bitter in your edit of Tau Epsilon Phi. Wikipedia promotes a Neutral Point of View in it's articles, and I've taken the liberty of altering your edit to be a little less, shall we say, pointed? Thanks again, welcome to Wikipedia, and the TEΦ's who care about our fraternity here on Wikipedia welcome you forever as a friend. There are quite a few of us! TΓ703 Timmccloud (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I am being honest and frank. I WAS AT ALL THE MEETINGS with national when they would not back ANY CHAPTER. Please be honest and not try to make it look like they care about their chapters at all


 * Look, that's fine. I've removed the "east coast" comment, and just left it at National was trying to reduce things, which is saying the same thing from a NPOV. I'm glad you went to the meetings, however that's irrelivent to wikipedia, and it's called Original Research and we frown on that too. If you want to rant about TEΦ, go find some bulletin board somewhere and tilt at windmills. If you absolutely must rant on wikipedia, that's what talk pages are for - we discuss opinions, and try to find ways of saying the same thing with a NPOV that can be referenced by external sources.  YOU are not an external source, unless you go write a book, get published somewhere, and then we can reference it.  It absolutely does not belong in the article itself - be honest, have you ever opened up a funk and wagnalls or a encyclopedia britannia and seen text like "this is not what happend if you want to put something at least know what you are talking about"? I thought so.  So please either follow our guidelines, or go rant somewhere else. I was a chapter chancellor in the 80's, I know all about the crap National did from a personal perspective, my chapter Tau Gamma (USC) was closed by national too - but bitterness and recriminations almost 2 decades later are misplaced and unwanted here.  So please, consider trying to say the same thing in a more neutral tone, reference your edits, and your efforts will be appreciated. I've been pretty nice twice now, let's stay friends, and try to work this out, ok? TΓ 703 Timmccloud (talk) 21:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

You are one of those who cannot give up the frat after all these years huh? I was not ranting, just staing the facts. I dont need to rant ANYWHERE because my frat life ENDED with college. Unlike yourself who still cars about the frat to edit the WIKIPEDIA (which is a fake ass encyclopedia) daily. You mention real encyclopedias and your argument is valid, but you CANNOT edit those books like you can this, so your argument is void.I said "this is not what happend if you want to put something at least know what you are talking about" because you put your own reason in and it was FALSE!! I edited the list of chapters that do not exist and put why my chapter did not exist. It is the TRUTH since I expierienced it first hand from the beginning. WIKIPEDIA is FILLED with this!! Why not get on with your life and not worry so much about this. Must have taken you a while to write and come up with the above. No need to write back FRIEND you are a typical tep.
 * LOL - No need to rant, eh? Timmccloud (talk) 12:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Excellent edit on the list; short, concise, and get's your point across. Timmccloud (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)