User talk:Lieutcoluseng/Archive 15

Category:Fort Charlotte, Mobile has been nominated for discussion
Category:Fort Charlotte, Mobile, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:War of 1812 forts in Alabama has been nominated for discussion
Category:War of 1812 forts in Alabama, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Places named after Thomas Jefferson has been nominated for discussion
Category:Places named after Thomas Jefferson, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:31, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Monuments and memorials to William Tryon has been nominated for discussion
Category:Monuments and memorials to William Tryon, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Confederate Memorial Day has been nominated for discussion
Category:Confederate Memorial Day, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:55, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Category renamed
I think that "Flags of the Confederate States of America" is a better name for the category. The official name was the Confederate States of America. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the input, Bubba73! That change to "Category:Flags of the Confederate States" was made for reasons I mentioned in "Edit Summary" at the time I renamed the Wikimedia Commons category. That "Edit Summary," however, was perhaps not as detailed as it should have been to properly explain the reasoning behind the category name change, so let me try to provide you a bit more detail here:


 * Firstly... the legal name of the national flag as first established by the Confederate States Flag Act of (May 1,) 1863 was "Flag of the Confederate States." For your convenience, here's a link to the Flag Act: An Act to establish the Flag of the Confederate States. Please note "of America" was never a part of naming convention used by the C.S. Congress in the law first establishing the Confederate flag. I say "first," because the Flag of the Confederate States from 1861 to 1863 (i.e. "Stars and Bars") was never codified into public law (the '61 "Stars and Bars" flag was used as a national flag de facto, not de jure).


 * Secondly... Renaming "Category:Flags of the Confederate States" also had the additional benefit of matching its U.S. counterpart (i.e. "Category:Flags of the United States). Please note "of America" is not used. I hope this explanation helps to clear things up as to why the Wikimedia Commons category change was made, Bubba73. Again, thanks for the input! -- Lieutcoluseng (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * OK, I didn't know about the Confederate States Flag Act, so let it stand. (I think I've seen both "US" and "USA" insignias, but only "CSA" insignias, not "CS".) Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks! As an editor, might you consider renaming main Wikipedia article for same reason (dropping words "of America"). I tried, but takes an editor. -- Lieutcoluseng (talk) 02:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Well, the Confederate States Constitution officially is for the C.S.A., so I don't want to change it. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 02:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The Wikipedia article I meant was Flags of the Confederate States of America, not the primary C.S.A. article. Sorry for the misunderstanding. -- Lieutcoluseng (talk) 02:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I still prefer Confederate States of America because it is what existed 1861-65. "Confederate states" could refer to the states that were in the C.S.A.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 00:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * For instance, "Confederate states" could refer to Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, etc. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:William Tryon has been nominated for discussion
Category:William Tryon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...GELongstreet (talk) 23:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Legion Act
I just read a post about the new Legion Act. https://www.legion.org/dispatch/246641/11-key-things-know-about-legion-act

I hesitate to update the Wikipedia article myself. Could you or someone else do so?

Thanks

208.104.49.156 (talk) 16:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC) William Jameson, LTC, EN, USAR

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from American Legion into History of the American Legion. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:32, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Ronald Reagan
Hi! Lieutcoluseng, on your edit here, can you tell me why you don't think Mr. Reagan was not a person to be included in the cold war ~ if I remember right he was very involved in the cold war ~ by the way nice to meet you. ~mitch~ (talk) 14:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe this will help ~ Ronald_Reagan ~mitch~ (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * My bad ~ I see you just moved it to the proper slot ~ thanks for your help and edits w/ Guild of Copy Editors ~mitch~ (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:1861 in Montgomery, Alabama has been nominated for discussion
Category:1861 in Montgomery, Alabama, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Pine Bluff (disambiguation).

User:Willsome429 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Lieutcoluseng (talk) 14:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1835 establishments in Arkansas


A tag has been placed on Category:1835 establishments in Arkansas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1835 in Arkansas


A tag has been placed on Category:1835 in Arkansas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:People from Jonesboro, Arkansas, by occupation has been nominated for discussion
Category:People from Jonesboro, Arkansas, by occupation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 13:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:People from North Little Rock, Arkansas, by occupation has been nominated for deletion
Category:People from North Little Rock, Arkansas, by occupation, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 02:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:People from Pine Bluff, Arkansas, by occupation has been nominated for merging
Category:People from Pine Bluff, Arkansas, by occupation, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 15:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9th Arkansas Infantry Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old State House ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/9th_Arkansas_Infantry_Regiment check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/9th_Arkansas_Infantry_Regiment?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Arkansas schoolteachers has been nominated for merging
Category:Arkansas schoolteachers, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 12:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bauxite, Arkansas has been nominated for deletion
Category:Bauxite, Arkansas has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:36, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Researching Individuals in Nazi Germany.
I am researching one Franz Weiss. He was in the German military during WWI and in the Berlin police after. Do you know of any ways to research individuals from that period online?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.28.64.39 (talk) 17:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Personally... I do not. There are German language family history websites you might try; but most require a subscription. You could also try contacting the two Austrian art schools where Franz Weiss taught painting for many years. They may have old faculty biographies on file. Since you, presumably, are not from a German speaking country; you should know that most academics in Austria have basic English language skills. If you contact one of these art institutes during the course of your research, please be aware that German speaking people typically do not use the term "Nazi" as the English speaking world does. The term "National Socialist" is mostly used. Also please be aware that both the word, and time period, are highly sensitive subjects within the German speaking world. With this in mind, you would be better off phrasing your research question with something like: "I am researching art Lecturer Franz Weiss and would like to know if you have any information about his time in military service between 1940 and 1945 available to the public." Phrasing your question this way will go over better throughout the German speaking world. Viel Glück (Good luck), Lieutcoluseng (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Lieutcoluseng

Thank you for creating List of members of the United Confederate Veterans.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:57, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dolley Madison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Todd ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dolley_Madison check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dolley_Madison?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1780s disestablishments in New York (state)


A tag has been placed on Category:1780s disestablishments in New York (state) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Adjutants General of North Carolina


A tag has been placed on Category:Adjutants General of North Carolina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Mississippi flag
Sorry, I did not see the template. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Houses in Smithfield, North Carolina has been nominated for merging
Category:Houses in Smithfield, North Carolina has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 20:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Governor of North Carolina (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Governor of North Carolina (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Veterans& has been nominated for merging
Category:Veterans& has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Battle of Sedalia
Thanks for adding some information to Battle of Sedalia, but I'm not finding where citations for the Union commanders, units, strength, and losses are. I'd like to add this information to the main prose of the article, as it needs beefing up a bit, but I'm not sure where this information comes from. Hog Farm Bacon 18:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

"Template:French intervention in Mexico infobox" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:French intervention in Mexico infobox. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TerraCyprus (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arkansas in the American Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saline River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Places named after Thomas Jefferson


A tag has been placed on Category:Places named after Thomas Jefferson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - RevelationDirect (talk) 03:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Province of North Carolina Article source
Hey, sorry to bother you but from the source you cited in your edit on the Province of North Carolina article, I couldn't see anywhere on the book page where it said that North and South Carolina split in 1712. Riverblade (talk) 21:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * No bother at all, Riverblade. It's been a while since I edited that page so give me a few days to remember exactly what I did with regard to the citation. The date of the "split," however, is correct. If that citation doesn't properly reference, I will need to replace it with one that does. Thank you for letting me know about the potential typographical error. Lieutcoluseng (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Flags in Infoboxes
Please note WP:INFOBOXFLAG and stop adding back US flags into Infoboxes as you did here: as such flags are merely decorative and do not "convey information in addition to the text". Mztourist (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * My apologies for not getting back to you on this sooner, Mztouris; but I seem to have archived your comment by mistake. I am grateful you took time out of your day to recognize the effort I put into updating that page prior to critiquing my use of a U.S. flag icon. It is always nice to see experienced master editors such as yourself "coach" less experienced editors, rather than merely scold. So, thank you for that.


 * Regarding your question as to my repeated use of U.S. flag icons, I have been following the example set forth on the Wikipedia "Template:Infobox military person" page: . But being as how you are so much more experienced than me, I presumed you already knew that. Have a great day, Mztouris. And thanks again for the expert feedback on my edit. Lieutcoluseng (talk) 06:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Linton Stephens
Based on your work on Alexander H. Stephens, you might be interested in working on the draft for his younger brother, Linton Stephens. Cheers! BD2412 T 01:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Organizations formed by merger has been nominated for deletion
Category:Organizations formed by merger has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Higher education in Arkansas has been nominated for deletion
Category:Higher education in Arkansas has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 01:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red River campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John G. Walker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Lieutcoluseng. Thank you for creating Little Rock, Mississippi River and Texas Railway. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   12:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind remarks.Lieutcoluseng (talk) 08:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Second Battle of Collierville
Hi @Lieutcoluseng, unless I'm misunderstanding what you're doing, it seems like you've done a copy-and-paste move of Battle of Collierville to Second Battle of Collierville. Can you undo that and go through the process at WP:RM (it should be an uncontroversial technical request) so that the article history stays with the content? Alyo (chat·edits) 17:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Alyo. I was going to do exactly that, but in the meantime it was reverted by someone and I really don't feel like going back and redoing all of the hard work I put into it.Lieutcoluseng (talk) 04:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Well, yes, they did that because WP:CUTPASTE moves are explicitly disallowed. I'm sorry that you lost your work, but unfortunately that was the only option. If it helps, submitting a move request only takes ten seconds :) Alyo  (chat·edits) 04:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)


 * That said @Alyo; it's a pity that Onel5969, who hastily reverted my work, didn't afford me the same level of respect you did by assuming good faith and sending an inquiry to my talk page first. All for naught, I suppose. Lieutcoluseng (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * To be fair, Onel is one of the most prolific New Page Patrollers on WP and has to work very quickly so as to not let the backlog get into the thoudands -- there's always AGF to go both ways, right? I also see plenty of cut-and-paste moves, and if I hadn't happened to see that you're an experienced editor I would also have just reverted the move and gone on with my day. Hopefully this doesn't dampen your mood too much though--take care! Alyo  (chat·edits) 13:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Merci Train
Sir - I would like to speak to you about the Merci Train page you have worked on. The work is very well done and I can assist with some other updates or photos but wanted to speak to you first. Please reach out to me at djk3002@yahoo.com  Thank you,  David Knutson Djk3002 (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1756 establishments in North Carolina


A tag has been placed on Category:1756 establishments in North Carolina indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:People educated at Missouri Military Academy has been nominated for renaming
Category:People educated at Missouri Military Academy has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 18:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Cemeteries in Chowan County, North Carolina has been nominated for merging
Category:Cemeteries in Chowan County, North Carolina has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Arthur Dobbs has been nominated for deletion
Category:Arthur Dobbs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:People by educational institution in Audrain County, Missouri has been nominated for deletion
Category:People by educational institution in Audrain County, Missouri has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 22:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Barons of Bernberg has been nominated for merging
Category:Barons of Bernberg has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Lords of Worb has been nominated for merging
Category:Lords of Worb has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Nice to see your datestamp
Thanks for your fresh eyes. BusterD (talk) 03:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Helena image
That ABPP/CWSAC map had been removed as a result of Featured article candidates/Battle of Helena/archive1 - there should probably be a consensus or a discussion before adding it back. I've had the use of those maps questioned at featured article candidacy and A-class review before, because they often don't have a functional source link because the NPS apparently deleted them from the internet, the yellow boxes often include peripheral activity so it isn't really a map of battlefield activity, and because they use modern USGS topographic maps as the underlay the geographic features often aren't really relevant to the battle. Helena is suppose to be the featured article of the day for July 4th with the battle's anniversary and Independence Day, so I want to make sure that it's all OK with the FA standards. I don't feel strongly either way about it because there's a nice map of the battle lines later in the article, but just wanted to let you know that the map had been excluded because it had been challenged. Hog Farm Talk 01:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Roger, Wilco. Happy Independence Day, Hog Farm. Lieutcoluseng (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Monuments and memorials to Gabriel Johnston has been nominated for merging
Category:Monuments and memorials to Gabriel Johnston has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 19:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Charles W. Whittlesey has been nominated for deletion
Category:Charles W. Whittlesey has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Battle of Atlanta
Battle of Atlanta has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:9th-century establishments in the Holy Roman Empire


A tag has been placed on Category:9th-century establishments in the Holy Roman Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Ymblanter (talk) 04:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1776 establishments in New Hampshire


A tag has been placed on Category:1776 establishments in New Hampshire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 17:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

edit summaries
Hello Lieutcoluseng, you have recently summarized some of your edits as adding or removing wikilinks, when in fact those edits have not done neither. Please take more care to summarize your edits correctly, and perhaps avoid reusing past edit summaries? Regards CapnZapp (talk) 18:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the tip.Lieutcoluseng (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1776 in New Hampshire


A tag has been placed on Category:1776 in New Hampshire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:19th-century controversies by country has been nominated for merging
Category:19th-century controversies by country has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)