User talk:Lifebaka/Archive 1

Please add new comments in new sections. I will respond to messages here unless you ask otherwise. Or, if you're notifying me of a problem, I'll probably just fix it and leave it at that.

Casey Jones
Thanks for the ballad. I'm trying to clean up the folk songs, and need to separate this from the Grateful Dead song, even though they started out as folkies. I'll find a Roud Folk Song Index number. It needs a photo, maybe the same as the Casy Jones primary article.Pustelnik (talk) 17:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Ed O'Loughlin
By what logic can you just cancel an application to reconsider a deletion without providing proper specific reasons? "Speedy denial!" Merely to rebound a comment that the application is in bad faith is not good enough. I refuse to grovel to you "Lifebaka" or to Wikipedia. Be sure this is not a game of "snakes and ladders". There may be outside avenues to address this form of engineered censorship. Certainly, if there is no proper consideration of my claims, and by that I mean evidence how the conduct of the debate on "Ed O"Loughlin" deletion was conducted appropriately or otherwise, there will be further problems for Wikipedia arising out of this matter.

Many Thanks,

124.191.88.235 (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Virtual Tour Engine
Hi Thanks a lot. I'm really new in adding content to wikipedia and I wasn't aware of this policy. Sorry for problem. I read the policy that you mentioned to me and delete some parts. hope that make the article verifiable. Please tell me if you think this needs more modifications. regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by H ghaderian (talk • contribs) 19:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Claes Johansson
...I have added a source :( I add a source to every Olympic medalist... Doma-w 17:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Load Pull
Thanks for creating the Source Pull redirect yesterday, I was in a real hurry so was going to finish doing that today and I find that it's already done. Excellent. JMiall ₰  12:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi there!
You seem to have added a cleanup tag to the Scientific Temper article. But there's hardly anything in there to clean up yet, is there?  Amit @  Talk   13:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Internet as a source of prior art
Hi, thanks for your interest in the article Internet as a source of prior art. I wonder.. what should be wikified in the article? --Edcolins 16:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot for your answer. I have just created the article so that it reads like an encyclopedic article, but I may have missed something here. I have provided references, a background section, and so on. I am willing to improve the article, but I am afraid to say that your tag and answer are just not helpul. I have removed the tag for now. Please be more specific. --Edcolins 16:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I have modified the introduction paragraph. Thanks. --Edcolins 17:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
about the disambiguation page... I didn't know that someone would mind... Eyra 16:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Aglish
Hello.... you should have sources for the Aglish page now.

Let me know if you need more.

Cheers Akilduff - 18:00 11 Oct 2007

Linux Editors
I agree that page should be deleted. I cant do the work on it right no that i wanted to do. I would rather come back later and do a better initial job rather than stub it out right now.

how do we get rid of it? i would happily delete it myself, assuming that as the creator I am allowed to do that.

jjk

Jjk 02:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Tagging
Please don't tag and run. It helps nobody, especially if you use a supremely vague tag in the first place.

Also, please think before moving to other titles for no reason. All the Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemetery articles say the full name for consistency and because there are many non-Commonwealth cemeteries with the same or similar names. Thanks. ➔ REDVEЯS has a new (red) iPod 15:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, from a glance at your contributions, you seem to be moving a lot of articles to "better" titles. So far, a large minority of them have been moved back. Please read Naming conventions carefully before deciding to move articles; or you can ask others with more experience at Requested moves to make the changes for you. Thanks. ➔ REDVEЯS has a new (red) iPod 16:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Leitrim SFC 2004
And what, may I ask, is the problem? I provided a reference for this if you looked closely enough. And I had already extended it by giving the full listing of results for the groups. And what in God's name do you mean by 'context'? The link to the Leitrim SFC page is there, it explains it (the SFC) in more detail, this is only relating to the year in question. Owenmoresider 02:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Whatever about the other point, which I felt could be learned via the link to the overall SFC page, what do you mean by 'wikilink'? If it's linking them to a page about the club, then I don't believe there are that many of them on the wiki, bar one I know. And I'm not from Leitrim either, so I wouldn't be as aware of the clubs' backrgounds in greater detail, to do it. Owenmoresider 19:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher application
Dear Lifebaka,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher!

Jmlk 1  7  09:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Shahbandar
It's all drawn from Commins, and when you have a single-source article, it's a bit counterproductive to cite every line as referring to the exact same source (though I could do this in extremis). Given this, and that the source itself appears credible, I believe the article has sufficient references to meet WP:REF. Why, then, should the tag remain? Biruitorul 12:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. However: a) that tag tends to be applied to controversial matters; is there anything especially controversial in there that would require additional citation? b) The subject is relatively obscure in English-language sources (just a few dozen Google hits), so it's unlikely we'll turn up much any time soon, and the source used is quite reliable. Biruitorul 22:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll tell you what - give me a week and I'll see what other references I could incorporate. The ones I have at hand appear rather peripheral and don't treat his life in full, but I'll check what I can use. Commins' entry on him isn't footnoted, and his bibliography is rather general, but he is a rather trustworthy source and seems like a big Syria expert, so I think what he writes is fairly reliable. Biruitorul 01:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

List of AMD K10 microprocessors
I was wondering why you added an advertisement tag to List of AMD K10 microprocessors. You said in your edit summary that "all external links appear to be from manufacturer's site", but they all go to VR-Zone's website, not AMD's website. This page is meant to be like List of AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors, but with K10 processors. (When I took the information from Phenom (processor), I only copied the VR-Zone links since they are the most current and accurate at this time). I have expanded the introduction paragraph and removed the ''cont ext'' tag. I will add some references tomorrow, but could you explain your reason for the advert tag? -- Imperator3733 06:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Catherine Pegge
Hi ... sorry it did look odd... can you re-look Victuallers 12:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Brotherhood of International Government and Order article
I fail to understand just why this article is scheduled for deletion.

The organization BIG O in 3 of the Matt Helm films had its name clearly spelled out and is just as immoral as T.H.R.U.S.H. or Spectre. Indeed, perhaps even more so given their attempt to make much of the American Southwest radioactive in the film The Silencers.

Doesn't Matt Helm's chief adversary deserve its own mention on here?

George Senda Martinez, Ca. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falkie2007 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Prod
I don't understand why you prod'ed Paul Robeson House. It is true that it only links to articles that don't exist today ... but currently seven articles link to it. There are two Robeson Houses and one Robeson Home. --evrik (talk) 17:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Henry Cooke (minister)
Do you really need the verify tag on it. DNB entries are themselves very well sourced. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, for me the verify tag is nonsense on stilts. We have hundreds and thousands of DNB, EB & other PD sourced articles which do not have this tag. The chances of anyone else coming along and improving the article is vanishingly small - ultimately, I doubt that the tag will do any good whatsoever, but it does (IMO) disfigure the article. The references cited in the original article (which you'll fogive me if I don't tidy up), are shown below. I cannot seriously believe that any wikipedian is going to go the the length that the DNB biographer went to. Finally, I'm damned if I can see why a long article becomes a trigger for such a tag. I ask you, strongly: please remove the tag. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The biography of Cooke by his son-in-law, Josias Ledlie Porter, D.D., now president of Queen's College, Belfast (1st edit. 1871 ; third, or people's edition, Belfast, 1875), is a sustained eulogy, very ably and thoroughly done from the writer's point of view. A brief but valuable me- moir is given in Classon Porter's Irish Presby- terian Biographical Sketches, 1883, p. 39 sq. See also Killen's edition of Reid's Hist. Presb. Ch. in Ireland, 1867, iii. 396 sq. ; McCreery's Presb. Ministers of Killileagh, 1875, pp. 225 sq. ; and Killen's Hist, of Congregations Presb. Ch. in Ireland, 1886, p. 266 sq. Crozier's Life of H. Montgomery, 1875, i., throws light upon the Arian controversy, but takes a very unfavourable view of Cooke's character. Original authorities will be found in the Minutes of Synod, which are printed in full from 1820; reports of speeches are given in the ' Northern Whig,' a journal strongly biassed against Cooke. Cooke's own organ was the ' Orthodox Presbyterian,' a maga- zine not established till December 1829; the Arians had the 'Christian Moderator,' 1826-8, and the 'Bible Christian' from February 1830. Smethurst's report is in the ' Christian Reformer,' 1822, p. 217 sq. Worth reading, on the other side, is 'The Thinking Few,' 1828, a satirical poem, by the Rev. Robert Magill of Antrim. For Cooke's encounter with O'Connell see ' The Re- pealer repulsed,' 1841. Respecting Cooke's second period at Glasgow College, information has been given bv a fellow-student, the Rev. S. C. Nel-


 * Thanks. The ONDB very comprehensively revised the DNB about a decade ago. I'll see if I can summon the energy... --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: "Allied with the Romulans (Star Trek)" userbox
Userbox modification Done per your request -- Sorry it took me so long to do it, school can be a problem :) -- FastLizard4  (Talk•Links•Sign) 02:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Louisiana v. United States (1965)
I have reverted your edit. The article refers to a United States Supreme Court case which is a notable part of history dealing with Civil Rights, specifically Louisiana's grandfather clauses which prevented blacks from voting. It is a separate case from United States v. Louisiana (1965) which deals with Louisiana's mineral rights in the Gulf of Mexico. I submit that they are both notable.--Cdogsimmons 21:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Notability tagging
You put a Notability tag on Secretariat (book). There are two problems with your action:
 * 1) Secretariat is one of the most notable horses in the history of American Thoroughbred racing with a worldwide reputation, was listed by ESPN at No. 35 of the 100 greatest athletes of the 20th century, one of three non-humans on the list, and the United States Postal Service honored Secretariat with his image on a first class postage stamp. Any Secretariat book put out by a reputable publisher is in absolute fact worthy of an article at Wikipedia;
 * 2) You ignored the WikiProject Thoroughbred racing when in fact you should have referenced your Notability "concern" with them. Worse though, is that you did this twenty-nine minutes after I had created the TALK page with the Project's tag placed there which showed up on the Edit Summary for New Articles.

I will take this is an honest error because otherwise it is simply very bad manners and an abuse of editing privileges that wastes other editors' time and confuses readers. Handicapper 15:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Matilda Hunter DRV
Hi. Just a quick note to say that I've added a comment to the Matilda Hunter DRV as you appear to be referencing the 1st AfD, not the 2nd AfD, which is the one under review. (The DRV isn't particularly clear, I know!) Cheers --Pak21 (talk) 07:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

CfD for taxobox categories
I just wanted to notify everyone that participated in the original CfD and the deletion review that there is a new CfD to reverse the proposed changes to the taxobox categories. Justin  chat 05:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Fingerboard AfD
Hi, this article has rewritten, please consider revisiting the AfD discussion to see if your comments have been addressed. Benjiboi 23:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

cristian fleming
I strongly advise you to take a look at this. Omotorwayo (talk) 14:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Soundz
Hi. Thanks a lot for that, I'm new to Wikipedia and have loads of information to add and update, but I haven't got much idea of how to do it lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olorinjoyce (talk • contribs) 12:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Try perusing a little harder
Hi. If you're going to turn down someone's speedy for an attack page, as a non-admin, please try perusing a little harder: ''After repeately kissing [name removed] on the lips, rumours surfaced about [name removed]'s sexual oreintation. In a candid interview on Saturday Night Live, dLO admitted to many gay romps during their spell as a tag team. After their matches Rowland would often visit the local gay brothels and engage ina night of wild orgies.'' The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I realized this about five minutes after I had done it--and logged off Wikipedia. I am sorry for the inconvinience.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Sorry if I was a bit rude about it. The Evil Spartan (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Soundz
Heey! I had the inuse tag on the Soundz page and you still edited it while i was trying to, causing an editing conflict.
 * Sorry. It looked as though you weren't editing it right then.  I appologize if it caused you much trouble.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 19:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

And if MySpace isn't a reliable source, then I suggest you go remove the hundreds of thousands of official MySpace links accross WP!
 * People do. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and WP:WAX arguements won't hold here anymore than an AfD.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 19:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

PS I'm still continuously editing the page so please do not remove the inuse tag or edit for at least 3 hours. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olorinjoyce (talk • contribs) 12:29, December 30, 2007

I didn't say Wikipedia was a social networking site! This is the official site of Soundz, the only official site of Soundz, and users can gather much information from there.

Anyhow, please see Soundz page discussion, I have posted a few questions directed at you there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olorinjoyce (talk • contribs) 23:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Again, please see Soundz' discussion page as I have more comments directed at you there. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olorinjoyce (talk • contribs) 12:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Manhasset Lacrosse
Can you tell me what the status is of this deleted article? Jdchamp31 (talk) 09:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It hasn't closed yet. Check the DRV after it closes.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Article comments.
The future event is allowed to be listed if it's certain to happen. It is, in fact, 100% happening. It's been confirmed by the band on multiple occasions and work has been shown towards the final goal.

Takenforaride77 (talk) 02:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Put a source on the article then, and make your case at Articles for deletion/Anti-Dingus, not here. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 02:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Las Ovejas
Thanks for your help editing the article i didn't know about the reference and summary importance so now i will add references to my created and future articles. Again, Many thanks...
 * GDuwen
 * No problem. If you need any other help, feel free to ask.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

The realm of no!
The page it was a recreation of is. g026r (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah. G4's still invalid though, since it wasn't taken to AfD.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * What would be the correct template to use then? g026r (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest you wait a few days and nominate it for AfD. It doesn't make any of the WP:CSD right now, since A7 doesn't apply.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 01:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll admit, I am somewhat biased in that I placed the original template on the previous version of the article, however I am uncertain why A7 doesn't apply.  Reading the article and following the sources, there's really nothing there that I see that suggests notability.
 * That all said, if the normal procedure is to wait and then nominate to AfD, I shall do so. g026r (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's just that the article isn't one of the article types that A7 applies to. Otherwise it would probably make it.  Waiting isn't necessary, but I'm suggesting it as a courtesy to the page author.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 01:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I think I bit you
Sorry. JERRY talk contribs 04:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Eh, it's fine. We've all got bigger problems than small misunderstandings like that, so no worries.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 11:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks. It was bothering me. JERRY talk contribs 16:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

A7, importance and notability
Thanks for your comment on the William Beldue article. As a new pages and recent changes patroller, I must admit that I sometimes (often?) get confused between the concepts of importance and notability. Especially when the tag expands to describe lack of importance, while its associated notice that I place on teh author's user page says "Lack of Notability". Truthanado (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. I only became aware of it pretty recently myself.  It's a fairly minute difference, considering, and notability is a pretty good benchmark to think about it by (especially since notability is more important everywhere else).  Besides, I pretty much agree that the guy doesn't appear that notable.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 23:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:Songs about fame

 * My mistake, I guess. Otto4711 nominated it, and since I had created it I posed no objection, so it was speedily deleted.  But there's no real point to it existing. JuJube (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * In four days if it's still empty it'll make WP:CSD. Or you can CfD it.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 22:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Milford Hall
Referring to you 'lack of notabilty' tag to this article I agree that houses are not in themselves of great interest except those important properties that are given Listed Building status. You will see that there is an attempt going on to build up the Listed Building categories. Milford is of course one such property. RegardsOrdyg (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Good Time (album)
Regarding your !vote in this AfD -- more info has been added to the article, and I don't think it's a crystal ball article now. Just letting you know. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Orange-peel doris
Hi,Lifebaka I specified in the history log that text was used with the permission of the author. May I please suggest that, when you nominate the article to be deleted, it might be a good idea to notify the creator of the article by a message at his/her talk page. Thanks for your contibutions.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I just can't see that permission has been granted. I'm sorry I didn't notify you, but please know that I'm already assuming good faith here by not tagging it for speedy.  You might want to check out Requesting copyright permission and such to make sure that everything's kosher all the way around.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 02:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for help regarding Dark Alex
Cheers for the help and advice with getting the Dark Alex page back up so it can be reviewed. I only use wikipedia occasionally, so I'm not up to scratch with the policies, sub-policies and terminology. Skip1337 (talk) 21:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

BTTF DRV
It may be that your comment in this DRV was based on the first AFD rather than the second. Please review the second AFD if that's the case to see if your opinion is any different. Thanks. Otto4711 (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Tiombe Lockhart
Hello, ... FYI, Articles for deletion/Tiombe Lockhart ... you had left some comments on the article's discussion page, so I thought that I should ping you ... Happy Editing! &mdash; 17:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Feloni DRV
You recently participated in the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Feloni (2nd nomination). As you may or may not know, the deletion discussion recently went to Deletion Review, (discussion,) and the result of the review was to relist the AfD for a third, and hopefully final time. I invite you to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Feloni (3rd nomination), so that we can finally come to consensus. -- RoninBK T C 16:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Page Fuck (disambiguation)
Hi, I readded the speedy deletion tag back to the page. Please read wiki policy, as this page is in violation of it. If in disagreement we should take this to the oversight for review. Take careThright (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
 * Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on whether or not it's against policy. However, that CSD is invalid, and I've removed the tag again.  If you feel strongly about having the page deleted, try PROD or AfD.  AfD's probably better, since I think I'd remove a PROD.  Cheers.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 01:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Policy "Reasons for deletion include but are not limited content that does not belong in an encyclopedia... Please read it. There are children who read wiki and this offends a lot of people. Second, you are not an admin and should not remove this tag.  If you desire to become an admin, removing this tag will only hurt you in the Rfa as it shows a lack of understanding.  Please take my comments in good faith. I am putting the tag back on.  If you think it should be removed you can take it to the afd.Thright (talk) 01:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
 * Okay, seriously, I already covered this. Wikipedia is not censored.  No amount of crusading is going to help you here.  I'm not going to revert it again, but only because there's a little thing called the three revert rule.  I can honestly tell you that any reasonable admin will remove that.  If it is deleted you'll be seeing a DRV quickly.
 * Also, I'm not really worried if these sorts of things will hurt me at RfA. I don't want to be an admin.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 01:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see "Wikipedia is not a directory." The current form of the article is nothing less than a stub of the word. Second I am acting in good faith, please dont threaten me with DRV.  This issue is larger than you think.  I am sure you would find this out if you study law.  Everything has limits, EVEN speech.  Social good outweighs content.  I am sure there are admin on wiki with children who will agree with me.  Anyways, please re-read Good faith policy, and maybe you might want to say sorry.  In any case, there is no need to respond.  Take care.  Thright (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright

?!?!
WHY IS LOGOS LAB SCHOOL SUBJECT FOR S.D.?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!?! Thanks-Letter 7/Caleb (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Uhh... It ain't.  "=!" means "is not equal to".  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 19:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

many thanks - kindly assist me
dear Lifebaka : many thanks for ur comment on my deleted article TF Quasar International", moreover i wish to request you to guide me to receive a copy of the same so that i may recreate the article with improvements .Pearllysun (talk) 21:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * How about you work on it as a subpage first, before moving it back into mainspace? If you can either do that or e-mail me the text (the e-mail I've registered works), I'd be happy to help you with it.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 00:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Raven-Symoné (album)
Would it possible to remove the recreation block so I can merge them? QuasyBoy 10:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There isn't one right now. Looks like it's been taken care of.  Huzzah for quick workings, right?  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 23:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Shirley Bassey
Regarding this AfD, I have removed the duplicate content from the Shirley Bassey page. The discography page seems more complete than what was at Shirley Bassey anyway, and given the discography's length, I think it should stay separate. Please reconsider your !vote in the AfD. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Great solution. Wish I'd thought of it.  Discography article could use some work now, but I withdrew the AfD.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 00:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD for PEI Media
I left the following comment at Articles for deletion/PEI Media When you search for the brand name Private Equity International, rather than the company name PEI Media, you get better results. The news references at http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Private+Equity+International%22 seem sufficient. --Eastmain (talk) 23:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I think I corrected what you were talking about
On the Zane Morris page, I put in the cite that you found. This is my first page to edit. Someone else put it up but I edited it to try to make it the best format and tone possible. I had found that site you found but put it in the wrong section. I also added a third archive site as a citation and asked about a fourth in the discussion. This should solve the issue that brought about the original nomination right? Like I said, this is my first time and I want to make it work and cite correctly and make it complete. Also, if this is all I need to do, how do I get the nominated for deletion notice off of the main page because it said not to delete it? Since you are a patroller please set me straight. I want to make this the best I can and like I said, this is my first time. Thanks for adding the help by the way, I appreciate it. Hyperbeard (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. Could use a little cleanup; I'll add that to my to-do list (which I will now go create on my userpage).  If you need any more help with anything, feel free to drop me a line here.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 23:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I appreciate it. Anything I can know to make it better let me know (like letting a pro cleaning up my mess, Ha!!). Will do on asking with any help with questions in the future too... Thanks for looking out! Hyperbeard (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)