User talk:Lifemaster

Experimentation/Vandalism on Peter North (pornographic actor)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Peter North's page on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you for your cooperation.
 * -Solcis 03:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Chidom   talk   05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Editing
''I don't understand the problem-especially with the latest edits of Ales Hanek. I cleaned it up so as to make it balanced, not insulting, etc. Much of what I wrote was from first-hand experience--i.e., direct conversations with him--and/or from email messages received from him. What else do you want from me? He is, in fact, always a bottom with Pavel Navotny. He has, in fact, made films through 2004. He has, in email messages and to me directly AND IN PERSON, said he has not made films since 2000 because the pay is so low. He has told me in person that he does not have sex with men except for money, thus his orientation is in fact really straight, NOT bisexual. He is an escort where I have indicated. (I took out the part about the client in LA. I admit, that went too far.) It is also true that actors and escorts in E. Europe are usually through at 30 because of the glut of new boys who enter the industry at 18. These are all facts. If there is some way I can restate them, fine. But I see no reason they should be censored.'' Thanks for your e-mail (above). My issue with your editing has been that you have changed information in several articles about men in porn without providing any sources for any of the new information you're putting in the articles. Most of your edits have included reducing the size of men's penises and making "catty" comments about them. That's vandalism.

If what you say above is true, it's unfortunate that none of it can be used in Wikipedia as Wikipedia doesn't allow Original research. If the information has been published elsewhere by a reliable source, it's fine to include it in his article here and reference the source that published the information originally.

Please do take some time and review each of the topics listed above. There are proper ways to do things here, and the more you know about how that works, the less likely it is that your edits will be reverted and/or seen as vandalism. Persistent vandalism results in not being able to edit articles here; see the Blocking policy.

Of paramount importance is that no information should be given in a Wikipedia article that isn't sourced—in other words, a reference is provided stating where the information came from. This is covered in greater detail in Attribution. Particularly with regard to articles about living people, Wikipedia must insist upon being able to verify information provided here by consulting a published reliable source. Biographies of living people is quite clear about that.

I cannot emphasize enough the importance of reading the articles listed above. I know it seems like a lot to absorb, but try to do one or two at a time. In the meantime, it's always helpful to correct typographical errors or make other minor edits to improve the way an article reads without changing the information in the article; spend some time doing that if you like.

I know it may not seem it, but you're most welcome here. Wikipedia truly believes that every editor has the capability of making valuable contributions and I hope that you'll dive into the information about how to do that.

You've gotten off to a shaky start—welcome aboard, though, and I hope you'll learn how to contribute here. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chidom (talk • contribs) 02:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

Editing
''I don't understand the problem-especially with the latest edits of Ales Hanek. I cleaned it up so as to make it balanced, not insulting, etc. Much of what I wrote was from first-hand experience--i.e., direct conversations with him--and/or from email messages received from him. What else do you want from me? He is, in fact, always a bottom with Pavel Navotny. He has, in fact, made films through 2004. He has, in email messages and to me directly AND IN PERSON, said he has not made films since 2000 because the pay is so low. He has told me in person that he does not have sex with men except for money, thus his orientation is in fact really straight, NOT bisexual. He is an escort where I have indicated. (I took out the part about the client in LA. I admit, that went too far.) It is also true that actors and escorts in E. Europe are usually through at 30 because of the glut of new boys who enter the industry at 18. These are all facts. If there is some way I can restate them, fine. But I see no reason they should be censored.'' Thanks for your e-mail (above). My issue with your editing has been that you have changed information in several articles about men in porn without providing any sources for any of the new information you're putting in the articles. Most of your edits have included reducing the size of men's penises and making "catty" comments about them. That's vandalism.

If what you say above is true, it's unfortunate that none of it can be used in Wikipedia as Wikipedia doesn't allow Original research. If the information has been published elsewhere by a reliable source, it's fine to include it in his article here and reference the source that published the information originally.

Please do take some time and review each of the topics listed above. There are proper ways to do things here, and the more you know about how that works, the less likely it is that your edits will be reverted and/or seen as vandalism. Persistent vandalism results in not being able to edit articles here; see the Blocking policy.

Of paramount importance is that no information should be given in a Wikipedia article that isn't sourced—in other words, a reference is provided stating where the information came from. This is covered in greater detail in Attribution. Particularly with regard to articles about living people, Wikipedia must insist upon being able to verify information provided here by consulting a published reliable source. Biographies of living people is quite clear about that.

I cannot emphasize enough the importance of reading the articles listed above. I know it seems like a lot to absorb, but try to do one or two at a time. In the meantime, it's always helpful to correct typographical errors or make other minor edits to improve the way an article reads without changing the information in the article; spend some time doing that if you like.

I know it may not seem it, but you're most welcome here. Wikipedia truly believes that every editor has the capability of making valuable contributions and I hope that you'll dive into the information about how to do that.

You've gotten off to a shaky start—welcome aboard, though, and I hope you'll learn how to contribute here. Thanks. &mdash; Chidom   talk   02:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)