User talk:Lifeof744

Please justify your persistent removal of verifiable and accurate references from BBC News, IMDb and the Independent from the Tim Kash article. There are a number of usernames who keep reverting to the same version of the article (using colourful, unverifiable language to portray Kash in a good light, with no mention of anything that could be seen as low points in Kash's career, even though they are integral to the article) and whose only activities are to revert the Kash article to the inaccurate and poorly-written version.

Too many negative and opinion based edits? Please clarify which parts are too negative for a Wikipedia article and are also POV and factually incorrect. The "negative" parts of Kash's career are supported by references to BBC News, IMDb and the Independent, and reflect the hype, positive and colourful language used in the current article, especially the hype about his time at TOTP but says nothing about the subsequent reviews and judgements made about him from critics and audiences that led to him being dropped from one of the BBC's flagship shows. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.164.251 (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tim Kash, you may be blocked from editing. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  12:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)