User talk:LightKeyDarkBlade

Visual editor changing parameter order
Just a heads up here, so to make it clear: The visual editor takes in the parameters of each template as they are presented in the respective documentation, and as you can see at Template:Infobox video game, this is the way it was sorted by consensus, even if it appears differently in the article (such as here it is split in three different categories, which makes it logical and easy to use). No matter what you do, the visual editor will change it, and therefore it is not worth fighting about, as there will quite definetly be someone who will use it (such as my proof edit, haha). Cheers and happy editing! Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 15:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see. Sorry, I didn't know that visual editor would sort it in its way because I normally use source editor. I forgot that there are people who use visual editor and I thought it would be easier to edit in source editing when it's displayed the same way as the template. Sorry again for the trouble. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 15:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * No worries! I'm glad this is cleared up. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 15:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Grand Budapest Hotel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  The Old Jacobite The '45 13:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. I was simply updating the text in the infobox along with the citation from the same film entry on the British Board of Film Classification website. Or have I been mistaken and that it is not the same entry? Nonetheless, I have not removed any content at all, merely updating it. You shouldn't have reverted the change by accusing me of removing content. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Instant noodle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruneian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Instant_noodle check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Instant_noodle?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Amiga wasn't a PC system
Read Amiga. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Weathering with You BO
Stop removing sourced information, As of Nov 10, 2019, Comscore has reported WW box office as $175,492,409 and reported that it was running in 13 Territories, In Box Office Mojo it has figures only from 9 Territories, So that extra amount comes from these not tracked territories, you have add them to reflect actual gross. Panda619 (talk) 23:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * "Sourced information"? I don't see that any of the values you give are in your "sources". And why only only specific weeks for the regions? You have no idea what you're doing. Haven't you read Template:Infobox film? It should only be the worldwide gross unless it is not available. The box office coverage for each country or territory should be covered in the article body per MOS:FILM.
 * What you're giving now is false information. You're adding the worldwide gross value (wherever you've obtained it from as it's not found in the citations) together with a few other territories to get a "total" worldwide gross. The 'worldwide gross' given by websites like Box Office Mojo, The Numbers, Comscore, etc is the TOTAL worldwide gross value, including the listed territories.
 * Moreover, if you want to revert changes, you NEVER revert immediately to a revision without considering other edits made in-between. That's basic Wikipedia procedure.
 * Anyhow, you're the one here with no sourced information. I'll be reverting the changes soon if you don't respond or if you can't give a convincing enough reason. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Neutral notice
As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.--Tenebrae (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RNA virus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SARS-CoV ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/RNA_virus check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/RNA_virus?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Ark Survival Evolved
Hey there! I noticed that you had edited the Ark page recently and I was wondering if you could possible add a section dedicated to the mobs. As in a list of mobs organized by DLC and mobs that come pre-DLC so that people can know what to actually expect when they purchase the game so they don’t get disappointed. Thanks! Antman2002 (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * We're not supposed to put those things per WP:GAMECRUFT. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 03:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Virtua Fighter 5
How come you won't accept that Virtua Fighter 5 is the final game in its franchise? The Virtua Fighter series hasn't had a new installment in 14 years. 172.250.44.165 (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * How come you won't accept that this is Wikipedia, a WP:TERTIARY source? Have you even read WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL or WP:ORIGINAL? The lead of the article should just remain to state that it's the "fifth installment". It being the final game is just what you think and your own idea, which doesn't belong in Wikipedia. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 10:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Terasail &#91;✉&#93; 16:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts 2
Hello,

In the article about Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts 2 it is written: "Soon after the game was released, it received >>mixed or average reviews<<".

Actually, soon after release the game had positive reviews on XboxX. The scores dropped later. Here you have screen-shot.

http://mickey.ugu.pl/MetaCritic/SGWC2_XboxX.JPG

You can also check the history on metacritic yourself.

You can do it by:

1) finding Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts 2 for XBox X on metacritic;

2) clicking Critic Reviews to get all the critic reviews;

3) click By date.

You can find that soon after publishing the game received two scores of 80, one of 85 and one score of 70. It was enough to call them positive reviews. The scores dropped 11 days later with the review from IGN. Hence, the version for XBOX X received mostly positive reviews "*Soon after* the game was released," but the average score dropped with the review from IGN. MichalZim (talk) 08:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Then we change the wording rather than writing "soon after the game was released". I just didn't change it before. The reception section shouldn't be a chronology (unless there's some specific event like review bombing) and should instead be a summary. It doesn't matter which review came out first or last, early or late. The general reception is still "mixed or average". LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Shadowrun Chronicles: Boston Lockdown: Difference between revision
"(Don't simply remove stuff like that, Cuvtixo. Even removing lines that separate the paragraphs. My goodness. You're destroying the page.)" The page has three and one   I think the page probably should be destroyed. Its been 9 years since the "update" was asked for, let's face it, it's never going to be updated. I think the article should be deleted really, don't you? Cuvtixo (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If your reason for the page to be deleted is simply "I don't think it's going to be updated", then it's not a valid reason to delete the page. Not to mention your edits involved removing content and templates, literally reducing the page's size and tags. You're just finding excuses to have the page deleted. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Thea: The Awakening. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Wait, what? Is this a level 3 warning right off the bat? I only did one revert, assuming good faith on your end and giving my reasons and arguments. I don't see how this is edit warring and even if it is, how it warrants a level 3 warning. This is an improper use of warning templates. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 18:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)