User talk:Lightbourn

July 2012
Please do not write an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Dr. Lightbourn. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. CtP (t • c) 19:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lightbourn Biochemical Model for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lightbourn Biochemical Model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lightbourn Biochemical Model until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CtP (t • c) 19:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr. Lightbourn


The article Dr. Lightbourn has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Absolutely no sources could be found other than those directly related to the subject, which means he fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 20:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Dr. Lightbourn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr. Lightbourn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dr. Lightbourn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CtP (t • c) 20:32, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lightbourn Biochemical Model has been reverted. Your edit here to Lightbourn Biochemical Model was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://lightbournr.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fundamentum.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the information we will be looking to read the opinions.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Lightbourn", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website. Please note that Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or shared by multiple people. Please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

We are a communication device in lightbourn research enterprise, we are two people, who are in charge of giving and sharing is to provide scientific information that we believe is for collaboration.

We decided to use Lightbourn because it is the first time on wikipedia, to enter easily to review the article and have a control of acounts in internet.

I am researching how to change the username.

Thank you.


 * No matter what user name you use, use of Wikipedia for promotion is unacceptable, and if you continue to do so you may be blocked from editing.. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Responce We would like to mention that this article is not meant to promote and we are working on making a neutral contribution for the scientific community and Wikipedia. We would very much appreciate if you could point out which parts of the article seem to be promotional so we could make it better. Gibran Zubiate. 10:12, 25 July 2012 (MST)

In response to your feedback
Your article is being nominated for deletion because it reads like an advertisement and lacks sufficient third-party sources. Consider visiting Writing better articles.

SwisterTwister  talk  02:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 12:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Send me a message to my talk page and I will see what I can do!

Ob tund Talk 02:20, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

&#160;