User talk:Lightbulb11261

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Staple (June 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ae245 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operation Staple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Operation_Staple Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ae245&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Operation_Staple reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ae245 (talk) 14:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Ae245. Can you review my article again please? I added reputable sources and refined the article. I can see this being a important article that will probably even be expanded. Lightbulb11261 (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ae245 Please review. Thank you. Lightbulb11261 (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Where did you get the term "Operation Staple"? I couldn't find it anywhere on the internet and it's not in the sources you added in the draft. Also, the content is too little, it should probably go in an existing article. Ae245 (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ae245 That might be because it's a new article/content for Wikipedia, of the utmost importance I might add. This subject is all over the internet right now. Pres Trump gave a interview about it to businessmen in Silicon Valley only a few days ago. Pres Trump is not the only individual that has spoken about this proposal. I only listed a few of the sources but I could go on and on if I had the time. Look up the word "euphemism" if that is new to you. Please let me know if there is anything else you want for approval. Lightbulb11261 (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ae245 I've seen other articles get approval for even smaller content. For example, "Great Replacement" started small and folks added to it over time. Please don't suppress knowledge. I see no reason not to publish it, there's already many articles that have been written about it. I Hope that helps. Lightbulb11261 (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Verifiable sources are necessary for it to be accepted through the articles for creation (AfC) process. For all I know, you could've made it up yourself, because there's not a single reliable source calling it "Operation Staple". The AfC process is used to determine if a draft is good enough to stay on Wikipedia (if it becomes an article). Currently, the draft wouldn't stand a chance unless it's vastly improved and more reliable sources are added (to confirm what's written in the draft). Ae245 (talk) 02:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Swingline staplers were made famous over two decades ago when the movie Office Space was released and has quickly become pop culture icon. Those that follow current events will instantly know what Operation Staple signifies, particularly those that work in the STEM field. I doubt you'll see it referenced in legacy media outlets/articles until the topic is either implemented or becomes more mainstream. Parrells to Operation Paperclip are uncanny. The historical significance of this article is huge. The article is filled with reliable sources. Not all knowledge is well known and is really one of the reasons why we have encyclopedia's.  Lightbulb11261 (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ae245 Thanks for your reply. See above. Lightbulb11261 (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)