User talk:Lightburst/Archive 12-31-23

Prodding an article expanded from redirect is usually a bad idea...
... if the redirect is reasonable, which this is. Instead it is better to BLAR or merge if the topic is clearly non-notable or better dealt with in one Wikipedia article. (I wouldn't oppose some kind of merge in this case). (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not opposed . I searched to see if they are a distinguished prof or head of dept. I think their notability is not there at the moment. I will let you take care of it. Lightburst (talk) 01:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A topic doesn't need to meet every applicable notability criterion to be notable. Even profs who are not notable according to WP:NPROF are commonly notable under WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG if they have published books or gotten media attention. I try to check all avenues of notability and alternatives to deletion before proposing deletion of an article. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand you . It was really not expanded; it is a stub, and my own checks have determined that there is not NPROF notability. I can leave you to decide to redirect or merge and failing that, I can send it to draft or to AfD. At AfD editors can determine if he meets WP:NAUTHOR, because being familiar with the criteria I do not see the subject meeting the guideline. Lightburst (talk) 02:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted for the SmallCat dispute case
The proposed decision in the SmallCat dispute has been posted. You are invited to review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 10:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for William D. Hoard
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi thanks, I just asked a question about this hook and the swapped out image at DYK talk. Lightburst (talk) 00:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

a small note
non-bios and non-U.S. hooks (of different countries) can be next to each other; please keep an eye on joined u.s. and bio hooks, though! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 03:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks Lightburst (talk) 13:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kossoff Burst.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Kossoff Burst.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Lightburst. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Anarchyte ( talk ) 11:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Lightburst. Thank you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Picture slots
Please stop filling up all the picture slots in prep sets if you don't intend to actually build one. It doesn't really serve much purpose at all, does it? I really hope you're not doing it in an effort to prevent a certain nomination from appearing. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * This is such a surprising message. I had no such intention. I just thought the promoted images and articles were great. My practice has always been to promote a few nominations a day. I do not ever fill a whole set. I do not think there is any rule about building a whole set. I try to help when I can. Lightburst (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey I should have also told you that you can feel free to move hooks and images in the preps. If you find a better image or you think one of the promoted hooks is needed elsewhere. cheers Lightburst (talk) 14:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I have done, thanks . AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

AE result
I have closed the AE request opened against you. Please consider this a formal warning to observe proper decorum in discussions, especially in contentious topics and when discussing living people. Discussions can often get heated in these topic areas and the last thing they need is further inflammation. As I stated at AE, the nuances in the way we discuss transgender people, especially before their transition, can be difficult but speculating on medical conditions a living subject may have suffered is inappropriate and statements like "women do not have testicles" (as far as they relate to gender identity and an identified living person) are provocative and unnecessary. It is not necessary or helpful to express your personal opinions on article subjects (cf. WP:SOAP). This warning will be logged at the arbitration enforcement log under gender/sexuality and BLP and may be referred to if you are brought to AE for similar issues in the future and may have a bearing on admins' decision to impose sanctions but I sincerely hope that the warning is all that is necessary. Regards, HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 20:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. I was not looking to continue bantering in that AE request but most of what User:El C said in there about "targeting" is aspersions. I will not pursue the matter but I thought you should know that I do not target anyone on the project. I have interacted with El C maybe 4 times in the last 5 years. As for your above statement, it will be easy to follow your advice. I appreciate an administrator such as yourself who understands the issues and does not assume bad faith. I am involved with the NPP backlog lately so I will see you around the project! Lightburst (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahaaha Rocks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingfish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

My pronouns
Just a FYI, my pronouns are she/her, per my user page.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 23:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not use pronouns when working on the encyclopedia. If you are offended by this reference to you in the DRV as the appellant or the word "their" you are getting worked up for nothing. Lightburst (talk) 00:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Connecticut field pumpkin at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Connecticut field pumpkin
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Pumpkin queen
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!
And thank you as well for your work on the Halloween set, Rjjiii  (talk) 03:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello Lightburst:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Oliver C. Dawson
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Copy/pasting comments
I don't know if you intended to quote my comment, but copy/pasting it (including the signature!) is something I consider a no-no. There's a template for that purpose. Renerpho (talk) 02:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I think that is a whoops! I must have made a mistake when I had the . Apologies!
 * Accepted. :) Renerpho (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

DYK concern for Nakba denial
Hello, I see Nakba denial briefly had its neutrality templates removed, including when you reviewed it, but the issues have not been resolved. There could in theory be a neutral article written about this distinct from Nakba but it's being maintained as a POV fork: obvious corrections using the exact text developed at existing, more balanced articles, are reverted without discussion. I don't have time to resolve right now, but it is an unrepresentative take on a hot topic, and seems a poor target for a DYK. – SJ + 18:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Your opinion is that it is a POV fork but that was not determined in the recent AfD. You have hung a dispute tag on the article, placed a notice on the talk page of the article, placed a notice the DYK template, and notified me here on my talk page. But you will need to get consensus for such claims; and to cancel a DYK nomination. In any event the DYK cannot proceed with a dispute WP:DYKTAG. Lightburst (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarity. I left a ping here b/c I wasn't sure if commenting after you on the DYK template was currently deprecated, and didn't know how oscillating tags were currently being handled. (Yes the above is my opinion, consensus sorely needed; let me know if you see a better option than tag + talk section in these madding times) Warmly, – SJ +  22:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Ralph Smith (American football)
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Interesting
Hi there. Wanted to reach out regarding your comment on Template:Did you know nominations/Bitter Legacy. I'm not super involved in DYK, so I want to calibrate. Generally when I've been writing or doing QPQ, I have leaned on the WP:DYKINT guidance of about hooks especially things like intriguing or unusual, leave the reader wanting to know more. Do you mind sharing your opinion on why the linked hook might not meet the criteria? Would it be helpful in the future if I left a comment on what I found to be intriguing/unusual or what more I wanted to know after reading? Thanks! &mdash;siro&chi;o 23:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't usually reject nominations based on "interesting". You did nothing wrong in approving the hook and our guidelines say likely to be perceived as unusual or intriguing by readers with no special knowledge or interest. It was rather factual and uninteresting to me but I promoted it. It is ok for us to have different opinions because it is a subjective criteria. If it runs we can circle back to this conversation and see how many people were attracted by the hook. Lightburst (talk) 23:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Debra Pross
Hello, Lightburst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Debra Pross, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Sugarbush Hill
Valereee (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Insightful comment
I appreciated your comment here. I agree with your take and think that someone who a) prides themself on being unnecessarily nasty towards editors who they personally dislike, and b) frequents a Kiwi Farms-lite harassment site dedicated to airing Wikipedians’ dirty laundry without their knowledge or consent so spiteful ex-Wikipedians can mock them, should not be an admin let alone an arbitrator. At the time of the cited incident I probably would have sided with Beeb/JSS because I considered you my enemy at the time, but I’ve since been on the on the receiving end of their contempt and that of other supposedly respectable users who use so-called BADSITES and think maybe it’s time for some stricter ethics standards for users in positions of authority. Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was upset with your ANI a few years ago but I never thought of you as an enemy. We all need friends or at least respect on here and we should always remind ourselves that each of us are donating labor. Time heals all wounds but the edit history remains. Sadly we can refresh our memories about every perceived slight by looking at previous edits. I read through that Halloween thread that you started several times. Oddly enough I looked at it yesterday and I had to stop reading it lest I remember the folks who said awful things about me. I think that there is one thing getting chastised by the community does for you: it frees you up to speak truth to power. To me, Beebs never seemed like the adult in the room. The fact that they cannot be trusted should be a disqualifier for an admin position. But going forward maybe you and I can each appreciate each other's contributions to the project. It is comforting to think that the arc of Wikipedia relationships can bend toward understanding or friendship. Thanks for the message... I added a dove above. Lightburst (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Comment at RfA talk
Hi Lightburst: Perhaps you were referring to something different. But I've just seen your "have a health issue" remark and my reaction was similar to ScottishFinnishRadish's. Perhaps you were recalling a different RfA from the one where the candidate simply disappeared mid-RfA and the reason turned out to be a life-threatening cardiac event, because I'm sure you would not wish to imply that such events are simply due to getting too wound up, let alone comparable to the "ANI flu". Or perhaps you weren't aware of the full story because it only emerged after the RfA had been closed. I can't believe you would intentionally be so meanspirited while making a comparison out of a generous motivation toward the recent candidate. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. I was stating the concern that SFR and ATG were referring to when they wanted folks to stop voting. I was saying that none of us wanted PE to frustration quit or get worked up enough to have a health issue as a result of reading the oppose rationales. The candidate was in good spirits and taking on the criticism-and they wanted to let the RFA run. In the case that I am tone-deaf what would you like me to do? Lightburst (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I get that that was your motivation, and I appreciate the sentiment. And this is on your talk page, and intentionally a bit vague, because there's nothing that can be done now to put the toothpaste back in the tube. But I would rather attribute the health mention to obliviousness—or your thinking of someone else entirely—than believe you to have been that "tone-deaf". Yngvadottir (talk) 00:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking in. Some editors talk at me or about me so I appreciate that you have spoke to me. I felt bad for PE, and imagine how soul crushing it is to read through. I imagine I should have wrote that response to PE without that last sentence. Lightburst (talk) 00:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

December greetings
Thank you for your "card"! - Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. - I wish you a good festive season and a peaceful New Year! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
 Merry Christmas! ''Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten! ¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua! God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus! Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce! Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством! শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스! สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส!'' ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành! Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete! Hello, Lightburst! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ★Trekker (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}} ★Trekker (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Christmas greetings
May the bells of Christmas ring for freedom!

May peace be upon us.

And have a happy and prosperous New Year. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

 ~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

'' Hello Lightburst: Enjoy the  holiday season &#32;and  winter solstice  if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Spread the love; use to send this message. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC) ''

Two against the world?
The first time he "shoots from the hip" with his block button, I'll be right there with an "I told you so." &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  15:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I am ultimately going to err on the side of protecting the volunteers and the content they create. If I get a hint that someone is going to be punitive or do a rapid-double-revert with no discussion I will oppose. I am ok being in the minority when registering my vote. I think if we could vote privately it would be best for the project. Many editors who presently want to be a sysop will rubber-stamp candidates. We should be voting for what is best for the project but with public votes it taints the process. Good to know you. Lightburst (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you think having fewer admins would be better for the project? – bradv  18:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Fewer admins is better than just adding admins that may not be right for the job. I am not infallible as you know - for instance I opposed your nomination for low main space participation. But I never thought of you as knee-jerk or punitive. I see this candidate as too involved in the drama forums and often they suggest harsh punishments for volunteers. We could probably use more admins like you, or Barkeep49 but those are not easy to find. Lightburst (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The issue I have with that statement is that having fewer admins will just lead to uneven, inconsistent, or even biased enforcement. There are other Wikipedias that have suffered from this issue, most notably the Croatian Wikipedia which was taken over by far-right nationalists (at the time they only had 27 administrators). I'm sure you know from your content work that only having a few editors on an article (particularly a controversial one) will allow their biases to shine through, whereas having lots of editors means it should eventually achieve neutrality (this is one of the core philosophical ideas behind Wikipedia – similar to Linus's law in the free/open source software world). The other point I would like to make is that I wasn't a good admin before my RfA. Similarly, I wasn't a good father before my first child was born. If I can claim either of these titles at this point, a lot of the credit is due to those around me. Getting good at something requires not just hard work, but also constructive criticism and positive feedback loops. In other words, good administrators are not "found", they are made. –  bradv  19:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Dr. Phil said, "The best predictor of future behavior is relevant past behavior". You had no past behavior that would indicate that you would be shouting Boomerang at dozens of editors who come to ANI for help. I am thankful for your comments here and I am always willing to consider changing my position. Lightburst (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Temperament
I noticed you inadvertently linked my RfA vote I made at the recently-withdrawn RfA. You're not necessarily wrong that my temperament isn't right for adminship, and that's why I have no plans on running anytime soon. While I think Banks Irk's comments went beyond criticism of the candidate on the merits into insulting, and they've now been blocked, perhaps my comment wasn't really necessary. I'll try to express disagreement more civilly going forward (I could have simply said "while I disagree with Banks Irk's reasoning"). I appreciate you striking your comment mentioning me. I think we have different viewpoints on a lot of matters, but I've noticed and appreciated your helpful contributions at places like DYK. Enjoy your New Year. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the message and my apologies. It was careless editing on my part. You are appreciated and I have enjoyed your contributions. The comment you made was technically WP:AVOIDYOU but I am not surprised Banks Irk was blocked. It is about the fourth editor I have seen blocked after opposing in an RFA. My wish is the RFA adopts Arbcom type voting. Lightburst (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Correction, the Banks block was oversight. Lightburst (talk) 21:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)