User talk:Lightning1115/CTBT sandbox

Hi a few things to consider:
 * Regarding One of the biggest concerns with infrasound measurements is noise due to exposure from wind. my question was, biggest concerns for what? I'm assuming you mean false positives? This could be clarified.
 * Great job defining acronmys and initialisms at first use
 * In Wikipedia articles, references should come directly after punctuation. This is pretty easy to fix in Visual Editor--just drag and drop the reference to the other side of the punctuation
 * I'd encourage you to link to noble gases unless it's linked already in the article. In general, concepts should only be linked at their first occurrence in an article, but there are some exceptions (links can be duplicated in the lead and in the body, or duplicated in photo captions)
 * Periodic elements are not proper nouns, so "Xenon" should be "xenon"
 * Wikipedians love verifiability. In general, the thought is that pretty much everything should be cited. If multiple consecutive sentences come from the same source, though, then it is acceptable to cite the source once at the end of the consecutive sentences. That means you shouldn't have any section or paragraph end without a citation, as your first two do.
 * Inconsistency in whether you say "on-site inspections", "On Site Inspection" or "On-Site inspection". Consistency in capitalization and hyphen usage is preferred :)
 * Your citations look reliable, and I'm trusting that you are accurately conveying the information therein.

Overall, this looks great! A few minor stylistic things to correct, and adding a couple citations would be welcome. Let me know if you have questions about this feedback! Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)