User talk:Like.liberation

Advice on User:COFS
I noticed some uncivil responses from this user on the Talk:Youth for Human Rights International page. Feel free to post any such repeated offenses to WP:AN/I.--Fahrenheit451 21:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will do. I'm still getting a feel for the rules.  Like.liberation 07:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Your Recent Edit
 Your recent [revert] on the Youth for Human Rights International deleted grammar, spelling and readability changes that were made by a previously uninvolved and neutral third party editor. Wholesale reverts can be destructive and can inadvertently remove spelling, grammar and readability changes made by other editors. Please use reverts sparingly as a sign of respect to other editors who have attempted to help improve the article. Thank you. Lsi john 13:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I apologize, LSI john. I felt many of your edits omitted relevant information.  Our difference of opinion over what is relevant, I think, was why I reverted.  Like.liberation 07:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

YHRI article
Where in the reference does it say this: "A French human rights commission submitted to the Assemblee nationale in December 2006 a report including testimony of abuses on Scientology's part that harmed the physical and mental health of children."? Makoshack 10:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

The testimony is scattered throughout the document, which is itself the report submitted to the Assemblee nationale.Like.liberation 11:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * That does not answer the question, does it? Could you at least name the "french human rights commission" and give me the page number of the "abuses"? Makoshack 01:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It does, if you would read the source. The name is on the first page: "AU NOM DE LA COMMISSION D’ENQUÊTE relative à l’influence des mouvements à caractère sectaire et aux conséquences de leurs pratiques sur la santé physique et mentale des mineurs."  Can you read French?  I will translate this bit for you.  "In the name of the investigative commission regarding the influence of sects and the consequences of their practices on the physical and mental health of minors."  The president of the commission is a member of the French parliament, the commission was official, and the report was submitted to the Assemblee nationale.
 * There is this exchange on page 26, between Jacques Remillier, a member of the commission, and Roger Gonnet, ex-head of the Scientology office in Lyon:


 * S’agissant des mineurs dont les parents appartiennent à la Scientologie, M. Roger Gonnet a indiqué que certains enfants peuvent être appelés au service de commandement central de la Scientologie (la Sea Org) dès l’âge de six ans : « Certains enfants peuvent être en poste dès l’âge de six ans. Ils font un très grand nombre d’heures, en transportant des papiers. À partir d’un certain âge, ils sont susceptibles d’être envoyés dans le goulag de la Scientologie, le RPF : Redemption Project Force. Il y en a à Hemet, à Los Angeles, à Clearwater en Floride ; il y en a un au Danemark, en Angleterre et vraisemblablement en Australie.
 * M. Jacques REMILLER : Qu’y fait-on ?
 * M. Roger GONNET : Cinq heures de bourrage de crâne quotidien, plus dix heures de travail. On court sans arrêt. On n’a pas le droit à la radio, à la télévision, aux journaux. Dans la plupart des cas, les gens ne peuvent plus voir leurs enfants, leur femme ou leur mari, etc. Ils ne peuvent pas sortir tant que ce n’est pas fini ; cela peut durer des années. »


 * Do you understand that? Gonnet testifies that some children are sent to serve at Sea Org at RPF sites from the  age of six.  He says they are subject to ten hours of work per day, plus five hours of brainwashing.  He says they are not allowed access to newspapers, radio or television.  Most important of all, he says that their parents are limited in if not denied all access to them.  "They can't leave until they've finished; that can take years."


 * On page 35, Gonnet says that children are interrogated with Security checks especially designed for minors between the ages of six and 12. On pages 84-5, he describes the dangers of Narcanon for adolescents.  The last Narcanon in France closed in 1984 after one of the patients died.  This assertion was also reported in a French magazine, L'Expresse: Article du 3 août 2006 de Mme Solenne Durox « Sectes : d’une drogue à l’autre ».  I hope that satisfies your curiosity.  In any case, it backs up my statements on the YHRI page.Like.liberation 10:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

your recent edit
Like.liberation, I believe you have mis-read or mis-interpreted Krator's 3O.

His suggestion clearly allowed for multiple tags and stated that it was only an opinion, not mandatory wiki policy, that only one tag be used. He also clearly stated that, unless the editor was inactive, article tags should be removed by the editor who placed them, not another individual.

Your edit [here] was in direct contradiction to his recommendation.

In fact, Krator [reverted] Smee for doing exactly the same thing, only 4 edits before you.

You most likely read too quickly and did not grasp the entire 3O as it was presented. Please be more careful in the future lest your conduct be construed as rude and offensive.

After taking time to consider the tags, I would like to make a change from how the tags were. But if I do that before you revert yourself, it could be perceived as edit-warring and I wish to avoid that.

In good-faith, I respectfully request that you revert your own edit and replace the tags as they were.

Peace-in-God. Lsi john 17:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It appears that a subsequent edit, by another user, has re-added one of the tags.. so my request is moot at this point.


 * Thanks again. Peace in God.
 * -john Lsi john 18:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification

 * Your article is a great start. Good job with the reputable citations.  Smee 11:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * I expanded it a touch, added a few more citations, and added the infobox with some fields inputted. Smee 13:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC).

DYK

 * Congratulations! You did a good job with sourcing on the article.  Is this your first "Did you know?" recognition?  Smee 05:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC).

Did you know...
... that you could use one of the following userboxes on your User page? Let me know if you are confused as to how to utilize them: Yours, Smee 06:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC).
 * 1) -- User DYK -- Userbox, for users that have authored X articles on DYK.
 * 2) -- User Did You Know -- Userbox, highlights an individual DYK article created by a user.

three revert rule violation
You have breached the three revert rule on Youth_for_Human_Rights_International. Only the absence of a warning and your relative inexperience as a user saved you from a block. Please do not engage in edit warring. There is no reason why you can't let article content ride while you discuss it on the talk page. Next time you will be blocked. Spartaz Humbug! 19:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wasilla librarian letter of termination
I have nominated Wasilla librarian letter of termination, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Wasilla librarian letter of termination. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Acroterion  (talk)  22:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

new library version
Thanks for the new library version - I just wasn't certain how to put the rewrite together and I think you did a great job. -Classicfilms (talk) 17:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your nice words. I agree with you - the collaborative effort of so many has really paid off. Cheers, -Classicfilms (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

more on library section etc.
Hi Like.liberation,

It looks like the discussion is continuing. Could I ask for your input here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sarah_Palin#Summarizing_Mayoralty_section Thanks, -Classicfilms (talk) 18:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airbrite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Y Combinator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * FutureAdvisor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to YCombinator, Incubator, Co-Founder and Portfolio management


 * Betterment.com (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Founder and Co-Founder


 * Robo-Advisor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Portfolio management

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ND4J


The article ND4J has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Skymind


The article Skymind has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is PR-driven and / or WP:SPI. The article is cited to online business directories, company's own web site, interviews and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Raised $3M in funding strongly suggesting that it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Skymind etc.
Hi, I am curious if you are affiliated in any way with the subject of the above article, as well as related articles:
 * Deeplearning4j
 * ND4J (software)
 * Chris Nicholson (entrepreneur)
 * Adam Gibson (computer scientist)

If you could let me know, that would be great! K.e.coffman (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I use Deeplearning4j and other open-source code as a software developer, but I'm not otherwise affiliated. I opened up a discussion the Skymind talk page about the proposed deletion to address your points. Like.liberation 20:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Skymind for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skymind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Skymind until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Airbrite for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Airbrite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Airbrite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 21:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolfsuka
Hello Like.liberation,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wolfsuka for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SamHolt6 (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adam Gibson (computer scientist)


The article Adam Gibson (computer scientist) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ND4S


The article ND4S has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ND4J (software)


The article ND4J (software) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Nicholson (entrepreneur)


The article Chris Nicholson (entrepreneur) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Adam Gibson (computer scientist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Gibson (computer scientist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adam Gibson (computer scientist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Chris Nicholson (entrepreneur) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Nicholson (entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chris Nicholson (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Deeplearning4j for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deeplearning4j is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deeplearning4j until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)