User talk:Likegoldfish

• Which article are you reviewing? Toll Roads in Central Texas • Does the lead section summarize the article’s key points? What are the key points of the article, as you understand them? The introduction states the purpose of toll road and about where the privatized idea of the toll road came from. Later through the article the author goes on to talk about the pros and cons of the toll roads in central Texas. • Is the article’s structure clear? Does the group use/plan to use heading and subheadings, images and diagrams at appropriate places? I like the structure and the fact that the second heading was pros and cons. The first section is really clear and gave me a clear picture of what the article was going to be about. There are no images or diagrams. • How well balanced is the coverage? For instance, are the key elements given equal treatment? Are sections overly long or short in proportion to their importance? The coverage is balanced in the two headings. The only suggestion I have is maybe expanding on the pros and cons and maybe making each their own heading. • Is the language appropriate? Do authors use generalized language such as “some” or “many”? Could these references be replaced with fact? For what they have, the language is good and easy to understand. • Does the article contain unsourced opinions or value statements? No all statements are sourced and there aren’t any biased values in the article. • How reliable are the references? Does the article have enough/too few references? Why? For what there is all the references are reliable and reachable. • Based on both the progress report and the articles current appearance to what it looked like when the group began working on it, how would you rate the progress made so far? 2 • What do you like most about what the group has done to the article so far? Why? I really enjoy the topic from the start. Things like this hit home for me more because it is something that affects me each and every day because of the fact that I use the toll roads. And I like to read about the pros and cons, because honestly, I have a need for speed and love being able to fly down the highway. • What are two improvements you think the article needs that were not discussed in the group’s presentation? I think the article needs more pros and cons. • How would such improvements contribute to the articles quality? This would improve the articles quality because it would expand on more issues the toll roads cause and other reasons people love toll roads. • Do you have any additional comments or suggestions for the author? I like what you have. It is a good start.