User talk:Likelife/Archive 2

This is my Archive from July 2010 to May 2015.

July Metro
Simply south (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

 * Thanks. :) I wish more people would do that. I hate deleting stuff, and it gives me faith in the Wikipedia way. :D --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Bush gives his poodle a new collar
I think you were giving my fellow Americans too much credit in your edit summary at George W. Bush. I'm betting the writer didn't even know Blair was out of office by 2009. -Rrius (talk) 16:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I too assume it was an American; I just figure he or she was wrong for a different reason. While people knew who Blair was even before the Iraq War, most had never heard of poor Gordon until his press conference just before resigning. And then it was only because Jon Stewart made a bid deal out of it. On the other side, most Americans other than reporters are uncomfortable enough with calling a former president "President" that I just doubt that's it. -Rrius (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Unlike most of my countrymen, I'm well aware of his phone-throwing tendencies. My friends all think I'm weird for following British politics, but I think it's their loss. I mean, the entire Brown premiership was exciting political theatre no matter whether you were a Brownite, Blairite, Tory, or even Lib Dem. The best we ever get are political mini-series like the Clinton impeachment or the Florida recount. -Rrius (talk) 17:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Sydenham (disambiguation)
I think this is a clear case of MOSDAB. What do you think? Widefox (talk) 19:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Unless you consider those entries to be referred to by the name "Sydenham", this is clear-cut in the manual of style, I fixed the page removing those entries, and replacing them with the correct "part of title" links. I overlooked the primary topic, so fixed that too. Widefox (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

October Metro
Simply south (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: English city move opposes
According to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, to be a primary topic, you have to be more than the most important; you have to be more important than all the other things COMBINED, often substantially more important. Is Cambridge, England more important than Cambridge, Mass., Cambridge U., Cambridge, Jamaica, and all the other Cambridges put together? Is Plymouth, England more important than Plymouth Colony, Plymouth, Mass, Plymouth, Montserrat, Plymouth, Indiana and Plymouth the car combined? Decidedly not, in both cases  Pur ple  back pack 89    23:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Read my comment on talk:Cambridge. 11:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This is clearly nothing to  do  with  Wikipedia content. Remarks made by Purpleback  suggest  other motives, and I  suggest the proposed moves  are inappropriate.--Kudpung (talk) 22:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC) PS: It's actually  be suggested to  me now that  it's part  of a trans-pond cabal.--Kudpung (talk) 02:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * BTW, there are plenty of precedents to  negate this fatuous campaign - the histories around the pages on  Worcester and Newport  to  name but  a few. Do be sure to  cast  your !vote/comment whichever way  you  feel  appropriates on all the affected pages.--Kudpung (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Purplebackpack's interpretation of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is not accurate. The terminology is plain and easy to follow, and the policy  is clear for anyone who wants to  read it. --Kudpung (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

December Metro
. Simply south (talk) 08:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

London Wikimedia Fundraiser
Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

January Metro
Simply south (talk) and their tree 23:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 21:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

March Metro
Better late than never. Simply south...... 22:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the issue! Likelife (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

ERA DB distributed traction
Hello Likelife, thanks for your edit to the CTRL article with a link to DB's press page (which I hadn't seen yet). A couple of days ago I posted a formatted cite/note for the original report at Talk:Channel Tunnel, but haven't had a chance to write it up yet. —Sladen (talk) 15:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah I did not notice that and your welcome.Likelife (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Barton Line
Hi, cannot understand why you switched the navbox on this article as Barton is in the Yorkshire and Humber region and not in the East Midlands region. I think that Barton Line needs removing from the East Midlands navbox as it is incorrect. Keith D (talk) 12:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry, just looking at the North Lincolnshire article, I did not realise that this part of Lincolnshire is in the Y&H region, I thought it was in the East Mids like the rest of the county. Also because I did see the line in the East Midlands box and not the Yorkshire one I thought it confirmed that. Likelife (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, it confuses a lot of people that Lincolnshire spans the 2 regions. Keith D (talk) 18:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

May Metro
Simply south...... trying to improve for 5 years 22:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

July Metro
Simply south...... digging mountains for 5 years 21:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

August Metro
Simply south...... unintentionally mispelling fr 5 years So much for ER 17:54, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Kent
BBC News It says "in the Medway towns in Kent" which is in Kent County not London. IJA (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)


 * BBC News Here is a BBC article specifically about the rioting in Kent IJA (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)


 * No probs mate. I've re-added it. IJA (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Signpost Interview

 * Brought to you by Simply south...... eating shoes for 5 years So much for ER 19:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

London Overground and National Rail
Can I direct you to WT:UKRAIL? Simply south...... eating shoes for 5 years So much for ER 22:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

September Metro
Simply south...... eating shoes for 5 years So much for ER 07:52, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

November Metro
Simply south...... "time, department skies" for 5 years 01:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited InterCity West Coast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

New Year Metro
Sorry its late and happy new year. Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 23:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

February Metro
Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 22:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

April Metro
Simply south...... going on editing sprees for just 6 years (as of 28/03/2006) 21:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

May Metro
Simply south...... going on editing sprees for just 6 years (as of 28/03/2006) 23:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

June Metro
On time for once! Simply south...... always punctual, no matter how late for just 6 years 21:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

July Metro
Simply south...... always punctual, no matter how late for just 6 years 22:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

August Metro
Simply south...... flapping wings into buildings for just 6 years 22:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

October Metro
I'm sorry I missed September but I was rather busy. Enjoy. Simply south...... wearing fish for just 6 years 23:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

WPNorthamptonshire Assess listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WPNorthamptonshire Assess. Since you had some involvement with the WPNorthamptonshire Assess redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MZMcBride (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Mid Dec Metro
Sorry this edition is so late. Simply south...... walking into bells for just 6 years 11:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Jan Metro
Simply south...... walking into bells for just 6 years 20:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

March Metro
Simply south...... catching SNOWballs for just 6 years 22:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

April Metro
Simply south...... eating shoes for just 7 years 20:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558881468 your edit] to Sydenham may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Disambiguation link notification for June 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Sydenham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Shirley, Blackheath, Next, Forest Hill and Grove Park

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Lower Sydenham railway station
Hi, re Lower Sydenham railway station; careful examination of a 1:25000 OS map shows that the Lewisham/Bromley boundary loops around the station to its south, so although pedestrians need to walk through some part of Bromley, the station itself is inside Lewisham. -- Red rose64 (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Hmmm that is confusing, it would have been so much simpler if they did all the boundaries by suburb. I'll change it back if it hasn't already - or should it say Lewisham/Bromley? Likelife (talk) 08:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It's likely that the platforms cross the boundary, but AFAIK it's the station buildings, not the platforms, that count for our purposes. The boundary commissioners try not to put a boundary through a building, since it complicates matters when it comes to council tax, responsibility for public services, etc. Thus, if we could obtain a larger-scale map - say 1:10000 or better still 1:2500 - we'd probably find that the station buildings are entirely one side of the boundary; possibly even with the boundary following a building wall. -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=562365678 your edit] to Eastern Suburbs & Illawarra railway line may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * New South Wales, http://www.sydneytrains.info/stations/network_map "Network Map - Sydney Train"  Retrieved 1 July 2013. The line is coloured an azure blue on Sydney

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=562804566 your edit] to Lithgow railway station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lewisham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South East London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Rail
Hi Likelife. I am intending on a more descriptive, less misleading classification for Britain's railways. Please give your thoughts as to how we can improve the current classification at the railways template where you have been a contributor. Adam37 (talk) 15:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Template:Major Development Projects in London
Hello. Is this template slightly broken? I ask because the "V T E" links for it don't work. I suspect this is because the declared name in the template is "Major Construction Projects in London" (i.e. Construction rather than Development), but I'm not a template expert. HTH, Stephenb (Talk) 10:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sydenham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forest Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567422439 your edit] to Urban rail in the United Kingdom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * and the busiest railway station in terms of trains per hour (Clapham Junction). All SWT stations apart from Fulwell, Hampton, Berrylands, Thames Ditton, Hampton Court and Strawberry Hill are

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urban rail in the United Kingdom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wimbledon, Great Northern and Weymouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Template:TSGN and SE Stations size
Hello Likelife, I've just spotted a load of template additions adding Template:TSGN and SE Stations. This template is quite large (absolutely huge). Adding in the region of 120kB+ to articles. Is it really needed? (We have a system of categories would could provide much the same with two clicks). —Sladen (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Sladen, I'm a little confused, I'm not adding the whole template to any article as most have only two or three routes, I would have thought only nowhere near that much would be added to the articles? Likelife (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Size apart, I fear the final effect may confuse readers. For example, if I expand the bar at Cricklewood railway station then I see a full list of ThamesLink Wimbledon Loop services, followed by bars for "Southern routes serving this station" and "Southeastern routes serving this station", neither of which can be expanded. Can we assume that readers will understand that this isn't a bug and that they can't be expanded because there actually aren't any Southern or Southeastern routes serving this station? Readers might reasonably object that if there aren't any such routes then we shouldn't have empty lists of them. NebY (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * User:Neby, admittedly I never thought about that, however, that could easily be changed to read none or no southeastern services for stations without those services. Would that be better? Likelife (talk) 09:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry for checking back so late, especially considering how quickly you dealt with it. Yes, that looks much clearer. Neat solution! NebY (talk) 06:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midland Main Line, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lincoln and Scarborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

50th edition
Here is the 50th edition. I can only apologise this is so late as a lot of work came up but it is still no excuse so again I will apologise. Inside includes everything since the last edition as usual. Enjoy. Simply south...... fighting ovens for just 7 years 22:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Oct Metro
I will also happily accept requests for the gallery (if not, images will be selected from archives elsewhere). Again I will also remind people that if they ever want to try doing a future month's issue, feel free to with your own style etc or even just stick to the current format. Don't hesitate to contact me for the resources of things to include in this newsletter. Otherwise, enjoy! Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 23:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

December edition
Please feel free to suggest any changes or add any requests such as images for the gallery. If you also want to have a try for the new year's edition or any future editions, please do not hesitate to ask. Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 21:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sydenham Hill railway station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Crystal Palace and South East London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Crossrail station count
I was inspired to edit the counter after which altered the count from 39 to 40, presumably to include Reading - but that ignores Twyford which is also included in the latest scheme. To make sure that others had not been overlooked, I counted the stations on Template:Crossrail RDT as follows: Total 42. How do you arrive at 40? -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 9 between Reading and West Drayton
 * 2 on the Heathrow branch
 * 14 between Hayes & Harlington and Whitechapel
 * 4 on the Abbey Wood branch
 * 13 between Stratford and Shenfield


 * Hi, there are 12 stations between Hayes & Harlington and Whitechapel not 14. The DfT, CR and TfL all say 40 too. Where you counting Old Oak and Kensal?+Likelife (talk) 08:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did count those two: but surely they're all "proposed"? The difference between Old Oak Common/Kensal Town and e.g. Ealing Broadway/Acton Main Line is that at the latter places, the station is already open for non-Crossrail traffic. -- Red rose64 (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * However, the proposed station at Kensal, like Silvertown, is only a proposal by Royal Kensington & Chelsea. Yes it is strongly supported but there is no allocated funding, open support or permission from NR, Boris, Osborne or the Transport Sec. At Old Oak, the article isn't clear if its planned or proposed, and normally more often than not, only planned stations are counted. Its still possible (though unlikely) that HS2 will be scrapped, though I'm sure the plans at Old Oak will happen regardless, it won't open until 7 years after Crossrail fully opens. We don't count Wixams as station on Thameslink or Lea Bridge on the Lea Valley, even though they're opening this/next year. Likelife (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Stratford navbox


A tag has been placed on Template:Stratford navbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — lfdder 18:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * This message has been sent by p joe f on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

Disambiguation link notification for May 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Govia Thameslink Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610493878 your edit] to Transport in Scotland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Troon 380105.jpg|thumb|250px|A [[First ScotRail|ScotRail]] train at Troon]]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Govia Thameslink Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Purley, Norwood, Crystal Palace and Redhill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Govia Thameslink Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwood, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brondesbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North West London. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sydenham Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)