User talk:Likio

June 2020
Hello, I'm Wario-Man. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Abu Dawood, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 07:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Abu Dawood shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  00:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Wario-Man, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  00:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

I gave you sources on Abou Dawud. Just one question : what is your proof Abu Dawud was persian ? Likio (talk) 00:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Stop commenting on my talk page
Take your concerns to Talk:Abu Dawood. Open a new section there and discuss your edits. That's all. --Wario-Man (talk) 00:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Dawood.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  00:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

What is your source to you ? Likio (talk) 00:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  01:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Advice
If this IP, is you logging out to edit, I strongly suggest you stop. Logging out to edit war will get you blocked. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:59, 4 July 2020 (UTC)